<p>Using restricted-access data from the 2021 National Financial Capability Study in the United States, this study examines the effects of financial literacy on risk attitude in financial investments. The instrumental variable quantile regression model is employed to account for the endogeneity of financial literacy and to quantify whether and how the effects vary across different quantile levels of risk attitude. For financial literacy, the percentage of college graduates in the Zip Code Tabulation Area serves as an instrumental variable. The results suggest that financial literacy has differential impacts across quantiles from 0.1 to 0.7 of risk attitude. However, its influence is not significant in the 0.8 and 0.9 quantiles. In contrast, the model that does not control for endogeneity underestimates the magnitude of financial literacy’s impact.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Financial literacy and propensity for risk-taking in financial investments: is there a link?

  • Seungyeon Cho

摘要

Using restricted-access data from the 2021 National Financial Capability Study in the United States, this study examines the effects of financial literacy on risk attitude in financial investments. The instrumental variable quantile regression model is employed to account for the endogeneity of financial literacy and to quantify whether and how the effects vary across different quantile levels of risk attitude. For financial literacy, the percentage of college graduates in the Zip Code Tabulation Area serves as an instrumental variable. The results suggest that financial literacy has differential impacts across quantiles from 0.1 to 0.7 of risk attitude. However, its influence is not significant in the 0.8 and 0.9 quantiles. In contrast, the model that does not control for endogeneity underestimates the magnitude of financial literacy’s impact.