Scholarlink

Purpose of Review <p>Ground-based 3D point cloud technologies, including static terrestrial laser scanning (TLS), mobile laser scanning (MLS), and close-range photogrammetry, are increasingly used for estimation of aboveground vegetation biomass as they provide detailed structural representations across vegetation types; however, a comprehensive synthesis of how point-cloud data are translated into biomass estimates remains lacking. This review evaluates current approaches, performance patterns, and methodological gaps in biomass estimation using 3D ground-based point clouds.</p> Recent Findings <p>We systematically reviewed and analyzed 160 research articles (comprising 171 device-specific studies) published until the end of 2025 (first appearing in 2010). Research was dominated by tree-based applications (74%), with limited attention to shrubs, grasslands or crops. TLS was the prevailing acquisition technology (78%), although MLS adoption is growing. Biomass estimation primarily relied on allometric equations, volume-based reconstructions (e.g., quantitative structure models, voxelizations, convex hull), and parametric regression models. Reported model performance was generally high in tree- and shrub-based studies (median R<sup>2</sup> &gt; 0.8), but more variable in non-woody vegetation types. Despite rapid advances in 3D sensing, point-cloud-native deep-learning approaches remain rarely implemented in biomass estimation workflows.</p> Summary <p>Ground-based 3D sensing is maturing technically, yet methodological heterogeneity persists. Many workflows still depend on destructive calibration data, semi-manual preprocessing, and non-standardized modelling strategies, limiting reproducibility and cross-study comparability. Multi-sensor integration is emerging but lacks consistent upscaling frameworks. Future research should expand coverage of underrepresented vegetation types, promote standardized and automated processing pipelines, and systematically evaluate point-cloud-native deep learning architectures, both for extracting structural proxies and for assessing their capacity to estimate biomass directly.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Vegetation Biomass Estimation Using 3D Ground-Based Point Clouds: A Systematic Review

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年7月16日

查看全文
  • Rodolfo Bolanos,
  • Cristina Santin,
  • Diego Laino,
  • Emily R. Lines,
  • Celestino Ordonez,
  • Flor Alvarez-Taboada,
  • E. Louise Loudermilk,
  • Carlos Cabo

摘要

Purpose of Review

Ground-based 3D point cloud technologies, including static terrestrial laser scanning (TLS), mobile laser scanning (MLS), and close-range photogrammetry, are increasingly used for estimation of aboveground vegetation biomass as they provide detailed structural representations across vegetation types; however, a comprehensive synthesis of how point-cloud data are translated into biomass estimates remains lacking. This review evaluates current approaches, performance patterns, and methodological gaps in biomass estimation using 3D ground-based point clouds.

Recent Findings

We systematically reviewed and analyzed 160 research articles (comprising 171 device-specific studies) published until the end of 2025 (first appearing in 2010). Research was dominated by tree-based applications (74%), with limited attention to shrubs, grasslands or crops. TLS was the prevailing acquisition technology (78%), although MLS adoption is growing. Biomass estimation primarily relied on allometric equations, volume-based reconstructions (e.g., quantitative structure models, voxelizations, convex hull), and parametric regression models. Reported model performance was generally high in tree- and shrub-based studies (median R2 > 0.8), but more variable in non-woody vegetation types. Despite rapid advances in 3D sensing, point-cloud-native deep-learning approaches remain rarely implemented in biomass estimation workflows.

Summary

Ground-based 3D sensing is maturing technically, yet methodological heterogeneity persists. Many workflows still depend on destructive calibration data, semi-manual preprocessing, and non-standardized modelling strategies, limiting reproducibility and cross-study comparability. Multi-sensor integration is emerging but lacks consistent upscaling frameworks. Future research should expand coverage of underrepresented vegetation types, promote standardized and automated processing pipelines, and systematically evaluate point-cloud-native deep learning architectures, both for extracting structural proxies and for assessing their capacity to estimate biomass directly.