<p>We prove a stronger version of the keystone result of Dasgupta and Kakde (Ann Math 197:289–388, 2023) on the <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathbb Z[G(H/F)]^-\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">Z</mi> <msup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">[</mo> <mi>G</mi> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>H</mi> <mo stretchy="false">/</mo> <mi>F</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo stretchy="false">]</mo> </mrow> <mo>-</mo> </msup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-Fitting ideals of certain Selmer modules <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(Sel_S^T(H)^-\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mi>e</mi> <msubsup> <mi>l</mi> <mi>S</mi> <mi>T</mi> </msubsup> <msup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>H</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo>-</mo> </msup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> associated with an abelian, CM extension <i>H</i>/<i>F</i> of a totally real number field <i>F</i>, and use this to compute the <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathbb Z_p[[G(H_\infty /F)]]^-\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">Z</mi> <mi>p</mi> </msub> <msup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">[</mo> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">[</mo> <mi>G</mi> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msub> <mi>H</mi> <mi>∞</mi> </msub> <mo stretchy="false">/</mo> <mi>F</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo stretchy="false">]</mo> </mrow> <mo stretchy="false">]</mo> </mrow> <mo>-</mo> </msup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-Fitting ideal of the Iwasawa module analogues <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(Sel_S^T(H_\infty )_p^-\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mi>e</mi> <msubsup> <mi>l</mi> <mi>S</mi> <mi>T</mi> </msubsup> <msubsup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msub> <mi>H</mi> <mi>∞</mi> </msub> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mi>p</mi> <mo>-</mo> </msubsup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> of these Selmer modules, where <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(H_\infty \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>H</mi> <mi>∞</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is the cyclotomic <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\mathbb {Z}}_p\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">Z</mi> <mi>p</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-extension of <i>H</i>, for an odd prime <i>p</i>. Our main Iwasawa theoretic result states that the <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathbb Z_p[[G(H_\infty /F)]]^-\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">Z</mi> <mi>p</mi> </msub> <msup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">[</mo> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">[</mo> <mi>G</mi> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msub> <mi>H</mi> <mi>∞</mi> </msub> <mo stretchy="false">/</mo> <mi>F</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo stretchy="false">]</mo> </mrow> <mo stretchy="false">]</mo> </mrow> <mo>-</mo> </msup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-module <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(Sel_S^T(H_\infty )_p^-\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mi>e</mi> <msubsup> <mi>l</mi> <mi>S</mi> <mi>T</mi> </msubsup> <msubsup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msub> <mi>H</mi> <mi>∞</mi> </msub> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mi>p</mi> <mo>-</mo> </msubsup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is of projective dimension 1 (unlike the <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\mathbb {Z}}[G(H/F)]^-\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">Z</mi> <msup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">[</mo> <mi>G</mi> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>H</mi> <mo stretchy="false">/</mo> <mi>F</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo stretchy="false">]</mo> </mrow> <mo>-</mo> </msup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-module <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(Sel_S^T(H)^-\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mi>e</mi> <msubsup> <mi>l</mi> <mi>S</mi> <mi>T</mi> </msubsup> <msup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>H</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo>-</mo> </msup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> which could have infinite projective dimension), is quadratically presented, and that its Fitting ideal is principal, generated by an equivariant <i>p</i>-adic <i>L</i>-function <InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Theta _S^T(H_\infty /F)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msubsup> <mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mi> <mi>S</mi> <mi>T</mi> </msubsup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msub> <mi>H</mi> <mi>∞</mi> </msub> <mo stretchy="false">/</mo> <mi>F</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. Further, we establish a perfect duality pairing between <InlineEquation ID="IEq12"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(Sel_S^T(H_\infty )_p^-\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mi>e</mi> <msubsup> <mi>l</mi> <mi>S</mi> <mi>T</mi> </msubsup> <msubsup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msub> <mi>H</mi> <mi>∞</mi> </msub> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mi>p</mi> <mo>-</mo> </msubsup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and a certain <InlineEquation ID="IEq13"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathbb Z_p[[G(H_\infty /F)]]^-\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">Z</mi> <mi>p</mi> </msub> <msup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">[</mo> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">[</mo> <mi>G</mi> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msub> <mi>H</mi> <mi>∞</mi> </msub> <mo stretchy="false">/</mo> <mi>F</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo stretchy="false">]</mo> </mrow> <mo stretchy="false">]</mo> </mrow> <mo>-</mo> </msup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-module <InlineEquation ID="IEq14"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\mathcal {M}}_S^T(H_\infty )^-\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msubsup> <mi mathvariant="script">M</mi> <mi>S</mi> <mi>T</mi> </msubsup> <msup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msub> <mi>H</mi> <mi>∞</mi> </msub> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo>-</mo> </msup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, essentially introduced by Greither and the second author in (J Algebraic Geom 24:629–692, 2015). As a consequence, we recover the Equivariant Main Conjecture for the Tate module <InlineEquation ID="IEq15"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(T_p(\mathcal M_S^T(H_\infty ))^-\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mi>p</mi> </msub> <msup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msubsup> <mi mathvariant="script">M</mi> <mi>S</mi> <mi>T</mi> </msubsup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msub> <mi>H</mi> <mi>∞</mi> </msub> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo>-</mo> </msup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, proved in loc.cit. under the hypothesis that the classical Iwasawa <InlineEquation ID="IEq16"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mu \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>μ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-invariant associated with <i>H</i> and <i>p</i> vanishes. As a further consequence, we give an unconditional proof of the refined Coates–Sinnott Conjecture, proved in loc.cit. under the same <InlineEquation ID="IEq17"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mu =0\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>μ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> hypothesis, and also proved unconditionally but with different methods by Johnston and Nickel in (An unconditional proof of the abelian equivariant Iwasawa main conjecture and applications, arxiv:2010.03186), regarding the <InlineEquation ID="IEq18"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathbb Z[G(H/F)]\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">Z</mi> <mo stretchy="false">[</mo> <mi>G</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>H</mi> <mo stretchy="false">/</mo> <mi>F</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> <mo stretchy="false">]</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-Fitting ideals of the higher Quillen <i>K</i>-groups <InlineEquation ID="IEq19"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(K_{2n-2}({\mathcal {O}}_{H,S})\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi>K</mi> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> <mi>n</mi> <mo>-</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msub> <mi mathvariant="script">O</mi> <mrow> <mi>H</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>S</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, for all <InlineEquation ID="IEq20"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(n\ge 2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>≥</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. Finally, we combine the techniques developed in the process with the method of “Taylor–Wiles primes” (introduced by Wiles (Ann Math (2) 131: 555–565, 1990) and refined by Greither in (Math Z 233: 515–534, 2000)) to strengthen further the keystone result in Dasgupta and Kakde (Ann Math 197:289–388, 2023) and prove, as a consequence, a conjecture of Burns–Kurihara–Sano on Fitting ideals of Selmer groups of CM number fields.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

An unconditional equivariant main conjecture in Iwasawa theory and applications

  • Rusiru Gambheera,
  • Cristian D. Popescu

摘要

We prove a stronger version of the keystone result of Dasgupta and Kakde (Ann Math 197:289–388, 2023) on the \(\mathbb Z[G(H/F)]^-\) Z [ G ( H / F ) ] - -Fitting ideals of certain Selmer modules \(Sel_S^T(H)^-\) S e l S T ( H ) - associated with an abelian, CM extension H/F of a totally real number field F, and use this to compute the \(\mathbb Z_p[[G(H_\infty /F)]]^-\) Z p [ [ G ( H / F ) ] ] - -Fitting ideal of the Iwasawa module analogues \(Sel_S^T(H_\infty )_p^-\) S e l S T ( H ) p - of these Selmer modules, where \(H_\infty \) H is the cyclotomic \({\mathbb {Z}}_p\) Z p -extension of H, for an odd prime p. Our main Iwasawa theoretic result states that the \(\mathbb Z_p[[G(H_\infty /F)]]^-\) Z p [ [ G ( H / F ) ] ] - -module \(Sel_S^T(H_\infty )_p^-\) S e l S T ( H ) p - is of projective dimension 1 (unlike the \({\mathbb {Z}}[G(H/F)]^-\) Z [ G ( H / F ) ] - -module \(Sel_S^T(H)^-\) S e l S T ( H ) - which could have infinite projective dimension), is quadratically presented, and that its Fitting ideal is principal, generated by an equivariant p-adic L-function \(\Theta _S^T(H_\infty /F)\) Θ S T ( H / F ) . Further, we establish a perfect duality pairing between \(Sel_S^T(H_\infty )_p^-\) S e l S T ( H ) p - and a certain \(\mathbb Z_p[[G(H_\infty /F)]]^-\) Z p [ [ G ( H / F ) ] ] - -module \({\mathcal {M}}_S^T(H_\infty )^-\) M S T ( H ) - , essentially introduced by Greither and the second author in (J Algebraic Geom 24:629–692, 2015). As a consequence, we recover the Equivariant Main Conjecture for the Tate module \(T_p(\mathcal M_S^T(H_\infty ))^-\) T p ( M S T ( H ) ) - , proved in loc.cit. under the hypothesis that the classical Iwasawa \(\mu \) μ -invariant associated with H and p vanishes. As a further consequence, we give an unconditional proof of the refined Coates–Sinnott Conjecture, proved in loc.cit. under the same \(\mu =0\) μ = 0 hypothesis, and also proved unconditionally but with different methods by Johnston and Nickel in (An unconditional proof of the abelian equivariant Iwasawa main conjecture and applications, arxiv:2010.03186), regarding the \(\mathbb Z[G(H/F)]\) Z [ G ( H / F ) ] -Fitting ideals of the higher Quillen K-groups \(K_{2n-2}({\mathcal {O}}_{H,S})\) K 2 n - 2 ( O H , S ) , for all \(n\ge 2\) n 2 . Finally, we combine the techniques developed in the process with the method of “Taylor–Wiles primes” (introduced by Wiles (Ann Math (2) 131: 555–565, 1990) and refined by Greither in (Math Z 233: 515–534, 2000)) to strengthen further the keystone result in Dasgupta and Kakde (Ann Math 197:289–388, 2023) and prove, as a consequence, a conjecture of Burns–Kurihara–Sano on Fitting ideals of Selmer groups of CM number fields.