Objective <p>The authors examined the effectiveness of an educational intervention aimed at improving psychiatry clerkship student clinical documentation skills.</p> Method <p>A 1-h didactic and “gold standard” sample writings of clinical documentation were provided to psychiatry clerkship medical students rotating on an academic consultation-liaison (CL) service between July 2022 and August 2023 (intervention group). A historical comparison group of medical students, rotating between January and June 2022, did not receive the intervention. Two examples of student documentation were collected, including note 1 (N1) during week 1 and note 2 (N2) during week 2. Note quality was assessed blindly using a standardized 100-point grading rubric.</p> Results <p>Thirty psychiatry clerkship students provided 60 examples of clinical documentation. There were no differences between N1 scores between groups. N2 mean scores were significantly greater in the intervention group over the comparison (77.4% vs 65.56%, <i>p</i> = 0.02). While all groups demonstrated improvement between N1 and N2, intervention groups improved significantly more than the comparison group (3.11 vs 11.7, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). Improvements were observed most in the history of present illness, family-social history, and review of systems sub-sections. Time of year, a proxy for student experience, did not impact note scores.</p> Conclusions <p>Providing medical students with a didactic and examples of clinical documentation improved medical student documentation on the psychiatry clerkship.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

“Read One, Write One”: Improving Medical Student Clinical Documentation on the Psychiatry Clerkship Using Example Notes

  • Gregg Robbins-Welty,
  • Dakota May,
  • Kristen Shirey,
  • Cameron Strong,
  • Catarina Carosa,
  • Carter Vanderloo,
  • Jordan Hildenbrand,
  • Heather Vestal,
  • Paul Riordan,
  • David Yanez,
  • Reginald Lerebours,
  • Kathy Niu

摘要

Objective

The authors examined the effectiveness of an educational intervention aimed at improving psychiatry clerkship student clinical documentation skills.

Method

A 1-h didactic and “gold standard” sample writings of clinical documentation were provided to psychiatry clerkship medical students rotating on an academic consultation-liaison (CL) service between July 2022 and August 2023 (intervention group). A historical comparison group of medical students, rotating between January and June 2022, did not receive the intervention. Two examples of student documentation were collected, including note 1 (N1) during week 1 and note 2 (N2) during week 2. Note quality was assessed blindly using a standardized 100-point grading rubric.

Results

Thirty psychiatry clerkship students provided 60 examples of clinical documentation. There were no differences between N1 scores between groups. N2 mean scores were significantly greater in the intervention group over the comparison (77.4% vs 65.56%, p = 0.02). While all groups demonstrated improvement between N1 and N2, intervention groups improved significantly more than the comparison group (3.11 vs 11.7, p < 0.01). Improvements were observed most in the history of present illness, family-social history, and review of systems sub-sections. Time of year, a proxy for student experience, did not impact note scores.

Conclusions

Providing medical students with a didactic and examples of clinical documentation improved medical student documentation on the psychiatry clerkship.