Scholarlink

Purpose of Review <p>This scoping review examines the extent and quality of research literature to determine the impact of motor skills difficulties on college or university students. It assesses the adequacy of current institutional supports and identifies opportunities for more inclusive educational practices.</p> Recent Findings <p>Four databases (PubMed, SCOPUS, PsycINFO, and Web of Science) were searched for English-language studies published since 1970. Eighteen studies met inclusion criteria: 12 empirical, 4 descriptive, and 2 program evaluations. Six papers from the UK addressed support, social isolation, and academic confidence; six Israeli studies focused on handwriting, dysgraphia, and accommodations; three US studies examined physical activity; and single studies from Canada, Sweden, and Italy explored social impact, assessment practices, and self-efficacy. Study selection followed PRISMA-ScR and Arksey and O’Malley’s five-stage framework. Findings were qualitatively synthesized.</p> Summary <p>Students with motor difficulties face challenges in executive functioning, communication, confidence, and daily living. While support is inconsistent, physical activity and person-centred approaches show promise. Early identification and inclusive practices are essential, with future research needed to centre the student voice and adopt longitudinal, strengths-based approaches.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

The Academic, Psychological, and Physical Impact of Motor Skills Difficulties on College Students: A Scoping Review

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年7月30日

查看全文
  • Suzanne McCarthy Wolf,
  • David Gaul

摘要

Purpose of Review

This scoping review examines the extent and quality of research literature to determine the impact of motor skills difficulties on college or university students. It assesses the adequacy of current institutional supports and identifies opportunities for more inclusive educational practices.

Recent Findings

Four databases (PubMed, SCOPUS, PsycINFO, and Web of Science) were searched for English-language studies published since 1970. Eighteen studies met inclusion criteria: 12 empirical, 4 descriptive, and 2 program evaluations. Six papers from the UK addressed support, social isolation, and academic confidence; six Israeli studies focused on handwriting, dysgraphia, and accommodations; three US studies examined physical activity; and single studies from Canada, Sweden, and Italy explored social impact, assessment practices, and self-efficacy. Study selection followed PRISMA-ScR and Arksey and O’Malley’s five-stage framework. Findings were qualitatively synthesized.

Summary

Students with motor difficulties face challenges in executive functioning, communication, confidence, and daily living. While support is inconsistent, physical activity and person-centred approaches show promise. Early identification and inclusive practices are essential, with future research needed to centre the student voice and adopt longitudinal, strengths-based approaches.