Scholarlink

<p>The accuracy of modal parameter estimates from estimation methods built in the framework of experimental modal analysis (EMA) can be assessed by several methods provided the information of input loadings and output responses. However, a deeper investigation is necessary for estimation methods built in the operational modal analysis (OMA) framework to establish confidence boundaries for the modal parameter estimates. This paper aims to estimate uncertainties of the modal parameter estimates by testing the sensitivity of the damped natural frequencies, damping ratios, and mode shapes to the choice of the estimation method and data acquisition settings used in this method. The uncertainty estimates of the modal parameter estimates are tested for changes in the boundary conditions. The tests provide insights into tendencies for the accuracy of the modal parameter estimates when the boundary conditions provide a different set of “true” modal parameter values. A simple cantilever beam experimental setup is used to obtain benchmark modal parameter estimates from EMA that are used to estimate the accuracy of the modal parameter estimates from OMA. The method’s robustness in estimating uncertainties and accuracies for modal parameter estimates is tested for several independent experiments. The boundary conditions for the cantilever beam are changed to test the influence of altering modal parameter estimates on the estimated uncertainties and accuracies. The boundary conditions are changed using materials with different elastic properties and the connection pressure between the clamping device and beam. A method presented in Paulsen et al. (Proceedings of the 9th International Operational Modal Analysis Conference, IOMAC, 2022) calculates a representative modal parameter estimate from a set of modal parameter estimates based on weightings obtained from the modal assurance criterion. The method’s ability to reduce uncertainties and increase accuracies of the representative estimate is demonstrated by repeating a test setup ten times. The results present simultaneously a reduction of uncertainties and an increase of accuracies for the representative modal parameter when the weighting method is used. An evaluation of dependencies between the estimated uncertainties and accuracies finds a proportional relation for the damped natural frequency when the uncertainties are described as a relative standard deviation. The analysis presents higher accuracy for the damped natural frequency and mode shape estimates compared to the damping factor, and the accuracy of the damping factor is dependent on the actual value of the damping factor. These phenomena for accuracy are well known and indicate that the uncertainties of modal parameter estimates can be assessed through a sensitivity test of estimation methods and data acquisition parameters.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Remarks on the effects of the boundary conditions on the accuracy of the estimate of the modal parameters in operational modal analysis

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年9月2日

查看全文
  • Thomas T. Paulsen,
  • Giuliano Coppotelli,
  • Ilmar F. Santos

摘要

The accuracy of modal parameter estimates from estimation methods built in the framework of experimental modal analysis (EMA) can be assessed by several methods provided the information of input loadings and output responses. However, a deeper investigation is necessary for estimation methods built in the operational modal analysis (OMA) framework to establish confidence boundaries for the modal parameter estimates. This paper aims to estimate uncertainties of the modal parameter estimates by testing the sensitivity of the damped natural frequencies, damping ratios, and mode shapes to the choice of the estimation method and data acquisition settings used in this method. The uncertainty estimates of the modal parameter estimates are tested for changes in the boundary conditions. The tests provide insights into tendencies for the accuracy of the modal parameter estimates when the boundary conditions provide a different set of “true” modal parameter values. A simple cantilever beam experimental setup is used to obtain benchmark modal parameter estimates from EMA that are used to estimate the accuracy of the modal parameter estimates from OMA. The method’s robustness in estimating uncertainties and accuracies for modal parameter estimates is tested for several independent experiments. The boundary conditions for the cantilever beam are changed to test the influence of altering modal parameter estimates on the estimated uncertainties and accuracies. The boundary conditions are changed using materials with different elastic properties and the connection pressure between the clamping device and beam. A method presented in Paulsen et al. (Proceedings of the 9th International Operational Modal Analysis Conference, IOMAC, 2022) calculates a representative modal parameter estimate from a set of modal parameter estimates based on weightings obtained from the modal assurance criterion. The method’s ability to reduce uncertainties and increase accuracies of the representative estimate is demonstrated by repeating a test setup ten times. The results present simultaneously a reduction of uncertainties and an increase of accuracies for the representative modal parameter when the weighting method is used. An evaluation of dependencies between the estimated uncertainties and accuracies finds a proportional relation for the damped natural frequency when the uncertainties are described as a relative standard deviation. The analysis presents higher accuracy for the damped natural frequency and mode shape estimates compared to the damping factor, and the accuracy of the damping factor is dependent on the actual value of the damping factor. These phenomena for accuracy are well known and indicate that the uncertainties of modal parameter estimates can be assessed through a sensitivity test of estimation methods and data acquisition parameters.