Scholarlink

Purpose of the Review <p>The current review presents an overview of behavioral coping mechanisms common among individuals with substance use disorders (SUDs) using a socioecological framework. We identify individual-, interpersonal-, community-, and societal-levels of adversity and match them with corresponding levels of coping responses.</p> Recent Findings <p>Problem-focused coping is often regarded as the “ideal” form of coping, which has led behavioral interventions to prioritize teaching problem-focused coping skills. While these practices have shown efficacy, they may be overly focused on individual control and less effective for coping with adversity that is outside of one’s control. Collective coping practices may be an effective tool, especially for individuals with trauma, high lifetime adversity, and those that experience high rates of systematic adversity.</p> Summary <p>Our review highlights the importance of acknowledging lifetime and systemic adversity among those with SUD and building coping skills specifically designed to respond to adversity occurring in the community and at societal levels. Future research is needed to test interactions between types of adversity and types of coping to create an evidence-based guide for personalized coping strategies.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Socioecological Model of Coping with Adversity during Substance Use Disorder Treatment and Recovery

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年2月18日

查看全文
  • Tara G. Bautista,
  • Gabrielle Mohr Avitia,
  • Juliana Herrera-Arias,
  • Veronica Rivas,
  • Daniela Castaneda Mendoza,
  • Orrin D. Ware,
  • David Eddie

摘要

Purpose of the Review

The current review presents an overview of behavioral coping mechanisms common among individuals with substance use disorders (SUDs) using a socioecological framework. We identify individual-, interpersonal-, community-, and societal-levels of adversity and match them with corresponding levels of coping responses.

Recent Findings

Problem-focused coping is often regarded as the “ideal” form of coping, which has led behavioral interventions to prioritize teaching problem-focused coping skills. While these practices have shown efficacy, they may be overly focused on individual control and less effective for coping with adversity that is outside of one’s control. Collective coping practices may be an effective tool, especially for individuals with trauma, high lifetime adversity, and those that experience high rates of systematic adversity.

Summary

Our review highlights the importance of acknowledging lifetime and systemic adversity among those with SUD and building coping skills specifically designed to respond to adversity occurring in the community and at societal levels. Future research is needed to test interactions between types of adversity and types of coping to create an evidence-based guide for personalized coping strategies.