<p>Across multiple jurisdictions around the world, antitrust law is being discussed as a key instrument for addressing fundamental contemporary societal challenges of a global nature, in particular digitalization and climate change. These current discourses give new pertinence to a “classic” of competition law scholarship: the potential value of correspondingly global antitrust standards. Respective policy deliberations have received extensive attention, but not led to any success beyond the soft law realm. The present article explores the underdeveloped perspective that public international law may contain a hidden global antitrust standard already now, namely the “unfair competition” notion enshrined in Art. 10<sup>bis</sup> of the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property. The article investigates the possibilities, needs, and limits of “evolutionary interpretation” of this provision and finds that while antitrust law is certainly not comprised by Art. 10<sup>bis</sup> in its entirety, it may indeed be so in a variety of overlooked facets.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

The International “Unfair Competition” Notion as a Hidden Global Antitrust Standard?

  • Stefan Scheuerer

摘要

Across multiple jurisdictions around the world, antitrust law is being discussed as a key instrument for addressing fundamental contemporary societal challenges of a global nature, in particular digitalization and climate change. These current discourses give new pertinence to a “classic” of competition law scholarship: the potential value of correspondingly global antitrust standards. Respective policy deliberations have received extensive attention, but not led to any success beyond the soft law realm. The present article explores the underdeveloped perspective that public international law may contain a hidden global antitrust standard already now, namely the “unfair competition” notion enshrined in Art. 10bis of the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property. The article investigates the possibilities, needs, and limits of “evolutionary interpretation” of this provision and finds that while antitrust law is certainly not comprised by Art. 10bis in its entirety, it may indeed be so in a variety of overlooked facets.