Scholarlink

Introduction <p>To compare the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) premarket approval (PMA) trials of topography-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (TG-LASIK) and ray tracing-guided LASIK (RT-LASIK) for the treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism.</p> Methods <p>This comparative study was conducted between TG-LASIK (P020050/S012; Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX, USA) with Allegretto Wave Eye-Q laser and topography-guided custom ablation treatment planning software, and “WaveLight Plus” RT-LASIK (P020050/S043; Alcon Laboratories, Inc.) using the WaveLight EX500 excimer laser and InnovEyes Sightmap. Clinical outcomes were compared, including visual and refractive measures, astigmatic correction, mesopic contrast sensitivity, higher-order aberrations, and patient-reported outcomes.</p> Results <p>This analysis included 249 eyes (212 patients) that underwent TG-LASIK and 336 eyes (168 patients) that underwent RT-LASIK. At 12&#xa0;months, uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/16 or better (64.8% TG-LASIK vs. 70.2% RT-LASIK) and 20/20 or better (92.6% TG-LASIK vs. 94.4% RT-LASIK) did not differ statistically between platforms. However, more TG-LASIK eyes had 20/10 or better (15.7% vs. 2.5%, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001) and 20/12.5 or better (34.4% vs. 26.4%, <i>P</i> = 0.044) than RT-LASIK eyes. Both platforms demonstrated comparable refractive predictability and stability (<i>P</i> &gt; 0.05). For preoperative cylinder between − 1.00 to − 4.00 D, RT-LASIK showed greater astigmatic overcorrection (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05). At 3&#xa0;months, RT-LASIK showed higher mesopic contrast sensitivity at 3, 6, and 12 cycles per degree under glare, with more eyes achieving clinically significant gains compared to TG-LASIK (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). Both platforms induced changes in total higher-order aberrations, although not clinically significant. RT-LASIK also reduced spherical aberration from baseline. Both procedures showed a reduction in symptom severity for glare, halos, starburst, double vision, and dry eye.</p> Conclusions <p>While TG-LASIK showed superior visual acuity outcomes, RT-LASIK was associated with higher contrast sensitivity; however, both platforms demonstrate excellent visual and refractive outcomes. The majority of published studies are consistent with FDA PMA trends, showing potential reductions in spherical aberration and higher rates of 20/20 or better visual acuity with RT-LASIK.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Comparison of U.S. FDA Premarket Approval Studies Between Ray Tracing-Guided LASIK with InnovEyes Sightmap Versus Topography-Guided LASIK Using Custom Ablation Treatment (T-CAT)

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年9月29日

查看全文
  • Mina M. Sitto,
  • Majid Moshirfar,
  • Triston B. Crook,
  • Phillip C. Hoopes

摘要

Introduction

To compare the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) premarket approval (PMA) trials of topography-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (TG-LASIK) and ray tracing-guided LASIK (RT-LASIK) for the treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism.

Methods

This comparative study was conducted between TG-LASIK (P020050/S012; Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX, USA) with Allegretto Wave Eye-Q laser and topography-guided custom ablation treatment planning software, and “WaveLight Plus” RT-LASIK (P020050/S043; Alcon Laboratories, Inc.) using the WaveLight EX500 excimer laser and InnovEyes Sightmap. Clinical outcomes were compared, including visual and refractive measures, astigmatic correction, mesopic contrast sensitivity, higher-order aberrations, and patient-reported outcomes.

Results

This analysis included 249 eyes (212 patients) that underwent TG-LASIK and 336 eyes (168 patients) that underwent RT-LASIK. At 12 months, uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/16 or better (64.8% TG-LASIK vs. 70.2% RT-LASIK) and 20/20 or better (92.6% TG-LASIK vs. 94.4% RT-LASIK) did not differ statistically between platforms. However, more TG-LASIK eyes had 20/10 or better (15.7% vs. 2.5%, P < 0.001) and 20/12.5 or better (34.4% vs. 26.4%, P = 0.044) than RT-LASIK eyes. Both platforms demonstrated comparable refractive predictability and stability (P > 0.05). For preoperative cylinder between − 1.00 to − 4.00 D, RT-LASIK showed greater astigmatic overcorrection (P < 0.05). At 3 months, RT-LASIK showed higher mesopic contrast sensitivity at 3, 6, and 12 cycles per degree under glare, with more eyes achieving clinically significant gains compared to TG-LASIK (P < 0.001). Both platforms induced changes in total higher-order aberrations, although not clinically significant. RT-LASIK also reduced spherical aberration from baseline. Both procedures showed a reduction in symptom severity for glare, halos, starburst, double vision, and dry eye.

Conclusions

While TG-LASIK showed superior visual acuity outcomes, RT-LASIK was associated with higher contrast sensitivity; however, both platforms demonstrate excellent visual and refractive outcomes. The majority of published studies are consistent with FDA PMA trends, showing potential reductions in spherical aberration and higher rates of 20/20 or better visual acuity with RT-LASIK.