Scholarlink

Introduction <p>Switching from transdermal fentanyl (TDF) to other opioids is clinically challenging because of the subcutaneous reservoir that delays drug elimination. This study compares the efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) dose titration with morphine (MO) versus methadone (ME) as a “bridging” strategy to overcome this pharmacological lag.</p> Methods <p>In this secondary analysis of an observational cohort study, patients who required an opioid switching from TDF (≥ 50&#xa0;µg/h) to IV morphine or IV methadone were selected. As per protocol of the original study, patients were titrated with IV boluses of MO (<i>n</i> = 17) or ME (<i>n</i> = 22) until analgesia was achieved, followed by continuous infusion and subsequent oral conversion. The primary outcome was clinical stabilization; secondary outcomes included the comparison of final oral morphine equivalents (OME).</p> Results <p>Both groups achieved analgesia rapidly. The median IV dose required for stabilization was 10&#xa0;mg for MO and 15&#xa0;mg for ME (<i>p</i> = 0.152). Methadone demonstrated a significant “opioid-sparing” effect, allowing stabilization with equianalgesic doses (OME) significantly lower than those used in the morphine group and compared to baseline TDF.</p> Conclusion <p>IV opioid dose titration is a safe and effective method for managing TDF switching effectively eliminating the “waiting period” associated with patch removal. While both drugs are effective, methadone stands out for its ability to significantly lower the total daily opioid requirement.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Intravenous Opioid Dose Titration for Refractory Cancer Pain: A Comparative Analysis of Switching from Transdermal Fentanyl to Morphine or Methadone

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年7月30日

查看全文
  • Sebastiano Mercadante,
  • Yasmine Grassi,
  • Alessio Lo Cascio,
  • Giorgio Sapienza,
  • Flavia Sanzo,
  • Alessandra Casuccio

摘要

Introduction

Switching from transdermal fentanyl (TDF) to other opioids is clinically challenging because of the subcutaneous reservoir that delays drug elimination. This study compares the efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) dose titration with morphine (MO) versus methadone (ME) as a “bridging” strategy to overcome this pharmacological lag.

Methods

In this secondary analysis of an observational cohort study, patients who required an opioid switching from TDF (≥ 50 µg/h) to IV morphine or IV methadone were selected. As per protocol of the original study, patients were titrated with IV boluses of MO (n = 17) or ME (n = 22) until analgesia was achieved, followed by continuous infusion and subsequent oral conversion. The primary outcome was clinical stabilization; secondary outcomes included the comparison of final oral morphine equivalents (OME).

Results

Both groups achieved analgesia rapidly. The median IV dose required for stabilization was 10 mg for MO and 15 mg for ME (p = 0.152). Methadone demonstrated a significant “opioid-sparing” effect, allowing stabilization with equianalgesic doses (OME) significantly lower than those used in the morphine group and compared to baseline TDF.

Conclusion

IV opioid dose titration is a safe and effective method for managing TDF switching effectively eliminating the “waiting period” associated with patch removal. While both drugs are effective, methadone stands out for its ability to significantly lower the total daily opioid requirement.