<p>A localised learning theory—the geometric thinking model—posits that reasoning about angle concepts is supported by nurturing students’ ability to visualise and discuss different angle representations in problem situations. Following a large-scale study into the development of an evidence-based geometric reasoning learning progression in which a multistage Rasch analysis was used, this paper reports on 1090&#xa0;year 4–10 students’ responses to two angle tasks. The Rasch analysis led to the identification of eight distinct thinking zones. Further analysis of student responses to the angle tasks shows a progression in the teaching of angle concepts and the importance of nurturing visualisation and discourse in the construction of knowledge about reasoning within the angle concept.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

A learning progression for understanding angle concepts

  • Rebecca Seah,
  • Marj Horne

摘要

A localised learning theory—the geometric thinking model—posits that reasoning about angle concepts is supported by nurturing students’ ability to visualise and discuss different angle representations in problem situations. Following a large-scale study into the development of an evidence-based geometric reasoning learning progression in which a multistage Rasch analysis was used, this paper reports on 1090 year 4–10 students’ responses to two angle tasks. The Rasch analysis led to the identification of eight distinct thinking zones. Further analysis of student responses to the angle tasks shows a progression in the teaching of angle concepts and the importance of nurturing visualisation and discourse in the construction of knowledge about reasoning within the angle concept.