Scholarlink

<p>Fuel cells (FCs) were prioritized in this study using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), a widely accepted multi-criteria decision-making technique. FC selection weighed strengths and weaknesses. This study comprehensively examined all 21 parameters impacting FC performance. There are eight different types of FCs, each providing a unique category option. Factors most influencing FC selection were metal efficiency, durability/cycle life, and cost, with global weights of 0.155, 0.133, and 0.114, respectively. PEMFCs are the preferred FC type, given their global weight of 0.186 and the selection criteria. Fifteen parameters were used as indicators in a multi-index model to analyze five PEMFC alternatives. Proton Conductivity, Activity, Water Management, and Fuel/Oxidant Purity received weights of 0.186, 0.156, 0.129, and 0.106 in PEMFC evaluation. Given the criteria, the low-temperature PEMFC is best (0.298 global weight). Improved FC performance is possible through increased FC utilization, achievable by researching LT-PEMFs.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Prioritizing Fuel Cell Performance: A Developed AHP-Based MCDM for Fuel Cell Selection

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年4月9日

查看全文
  • Seyed Taher Kermani Alghorayshi,
  • Ali Rezapouranghahfarokhi,
  • Erfan Abolhasani,
  • Masoud Dorfeshan,
  • Milad Imandoust,
  • Samaneh Ayoubi,
  • Rahim Zahedi

摘要

Fuel cells (FCs) were prioritized in this study using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), a widely accepted multi-criteria decision-making technique. FC selection weighed strengths and weaknesses. This study comprehensively examined all 21 parameters impacting FC performance. There are eight different types of FCs, each providing a unique category option. Factors most influencing FC selection were metal efficiency, durability/cycle life, and cost, with global weights of 0.155, 0.133, and 0.114, respectively. PEMFCs are the preferred FC type, given their global weight of 0.186 and the selection criteria. Fifteen parameters were used as indicators in a multi-index model to analyze five PEMFC alternatives. Proton Conductivity, Activity, Water Management, and Fuel/Oxidant Purity received weights of 0.186, 0.156, 0.129, and 0.106 in PEMFC evaluation. Given the criteria, the low-temperature PEMFC is best (0.298 global weight). Improved FC performance is possible through increased FC utilization, achievable by researching LT-PEMFs.