<p>The purpose of this article is twofold. First, we prove that the 8-dimensional Lie group <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\operatorname {SL}(3,{\mathbb {R}})\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo>SL</mo> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mn>3</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> does not admit a left-invariant hypercomplex structure. To accomplish this we revise the classification of left-invariant complex structures on <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\operatorname {SL}(3,{\mathbb {R}})\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo>SL</mo> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mn>3</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> due to Sasaki. Second, we exhibit a left-invariant hypercomplex structure on <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\operatorname {SL}(2n+1,{\mathbb {C}})\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo>SL</mo> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mn>2</mn> <mi>n</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">C</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, which arises from a complex product structure on <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\operatorname {SL}(2n+1,{\mathbb {R}})\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo>SL</mo> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mn>2</mn> <mi>n</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, for all <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(n\in {\mathbb {N}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>∈</mo> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">N</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. We then show that there are no left-invariant HKT metrics compatible with this hypercomplex structure. Additionally, we determine the associated Obata connection and we compute explicitly its holonomy group, thus providing a new example of an Obata holonomy group properly contained in <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\operatorname {GL}(m,{\mathbb {H}})\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo>GL</mo> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>m</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">H</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and not contained in <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\operatorname {SL}(m,{\mathbb {H}})\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo>SL</mo> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>m</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">H</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, where <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(4m=\dim _{\mathbb {R}}\operatorname {SL}(2n+1,{\mathbb {C}})\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mn>4</mn> <mi>m</mi> <mo>=</mo> <msub> <mo>dim</mo> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mi> </msub> <mo>SL</mo> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mn>2</mn> <mi>n</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">C</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>,</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Hypercomplex structures on special linear groups

  • Adrián Andrada,
  • Agustín Garrone,
  • Alejandro Tolcachier

摘要

The purpose of this article is twofold. First, we prove that the 8-dimensional Lie group \(\operatorname {SL}(3,{\mathbb {R}})\) SL ( 3 , R ) does not admit a left-invariant hypercomplex structure. To accomplish this we revise the classification of left-invariant complex structures on \(\operatorname {SL}(3,{\mathbb {R}})\) SL ( 3 , R ) due to Sasaki. Second, we exhibit a left-invariant hypercomplex structure on \(\operatorname {SL}(2n+1,{\mathbb {C}})\) SL ( 2 n + 1 , C ) , which arises from a complex product structure on \(\operatorname {SL}(2n+1,{\mathbb {R}})\) SL ( 2 n + 1 , R ) , for all \(n\in {\mathbb {N}}\) n N . We then show that there are no left-invariant HKT metrics compatible with this hypercomplex structure. Additionally, we determine the associated Obata connection and we compute explicitly its holonomy group, thus providing a new example of an Obata holonomy group properly contained in \(\operatorname {GL}(m,{\mathbb {H}})\) GL ( m , H ) and not contained in \(\operatorname {SL}(m,{\mathbb {H}})\) SL ( m , H ) , where \(4m=\dim _{\mathbb {R}}\operatorname {SL}(2n+1,{\mathbb {C}})\) 4 m = dim R SL ( 2 n + 1 , C ) ,