Scholarlink

<p>In this commentary, I challenge Fabio Patrone and Marco Viola’s claim (in their 2026 article, Patrone, F., &amp; Viola, M. (2026). Non-consensual sexual deepfakes as direct personal harm. <i>Philosophy &amp; Technology</i>, <i>39</i>(94), 1–22) that their metaphysical approach to personhood provides a solid grounding for the attribution of blame to non-consensual sexual deepfakes Using two examples – <i>The Case of Mistaken Identity</i> and <i>The ‘Stud’</i> – I aim to show that Patrone and Viola’s metaphysical approach is neither necessary nor sufficient for the ascription of blame to non-consensual sexual deepfakes.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Some concerns over the attribution of blame to non-consensual sexual deepfakes: A response to Patrone and Viola

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年6月29日

查看全文
  • Garry Young

摘要

In this commentary, I challenge Fabio Patrone and Marco Viola’s claim (in their 2026 article, Patrone, F., & Viola, M. (2026). Non-consensual sexual deepfakes as direct personal harm. Philosophy & Technology, 39(94), 1–22) that their metaphysical approach to personhood provides a solid grounding for the attribution of blame to non-consensual sexual deepfakes Using two examples – The Case of Mistaken Identity and The ‘Stud’ – I aim to show that Patrone and Viola’s metaphysical approach is neither necessary nor sufficient for the ascription of blame to non-consensual sexual deepfakes.