Scholarlink

<p>In a recent article, Queloz (<i>Philosophy &amp; Technology, 38</i>(1), 2025) proposed that AI cannot rely on the systematicity of truth in normative domains to build comprehensive models. Beyond challenging AI development, the asystematicity of truth in normative domains underscores the essential role of individual human agency in practical deliberation. When faced with difficult choices between conflicting and incommensurable values, individuals must make judgements of importance that cannot be delegated to an algorithm. This commentary expands on the fundamentally personal nature of practical deliberation to argue in favor of generalist AI moral advisors over personalized systems.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Against Personalized AI Moral Advisors: Commentary on ‘Can AI Rely on the Systematicity of Truth?’ by Matthieu Queloz

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年4月7日

查看全文
  • Muriel Leuenberger

摘要

In a recent article, Queloz (Philosophy & Technology, 38(1), 2025) proposed that AI cannot rely on the systematicity of truth in normative domains to build comprehensive models. Beyond challenging AI development, the asystematicity of truth in normative domains underscores the essential role of individual human agency in practical deliberation. When faced with difficult choices between conflicting and incommensurable values, individuals must make judgements of importance that cannot be delegated to an algorithm. This commentary expands on the fundamentally personal nature of practical deliberation to argue in favor of generalist AI moral advisors over personalized systems.