Scholarlink

Introduction <p>Basal insulin injections have historically been administered via once-daily (OD) or twice-daily (BD) injections. Once-weekly (OW) basal insulin injections have recently been developed. This study aimed to quantify the relative importance of the administration frequency in basal insulin treatment preferences of people living with T2D in Canada, Spain, France, and Japan, using a discrete choice experiment (DCE).</p> Methods <p>Best-practice guidelines for patient preference studies were followed in a three-phase study design. Phases one (targeted literature review) and two (qualitative interviews) informed the development of an attributes and levels grid. Phase three consisted of pilot interviews to evaluate the feasibility of preference survey completion and DCE tasks among adults living with T2D across Canada, France, Spain, and Japan. Hierarchical Bayesian estimation was used to estimate part-worth utilities for attribute levels, then calculate the relative importance of each attribute among other attributes tested.</p> Results <p>The DCE survey was completed by <i>N</i> = 513 participants (aged 20–90; 54% male, 45% female; mean time since diagnosis: 11.6&#xa0;years). Participants were split into three treatment groups: basal insulin and injectable glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) naïve (<i>n</i> = 176), basal insulin naïve but with injectable GLP-1 RA experience (<i>n</i> = 176) and basal insulin experienced (<i>n</i> = 161). The administration frequency had a relative importance of 40% across the full sample, double that of any other treatment attribute tested in this study. A preference for OW administration was found relative to OD and BD. Findings were consistent across treatment groups and countries.</p> Conclusions <p>This study demonstrated the value and importance of administration frequency in making choices for basal insulin treatments when glycemic control is held constant. Per the pre-specified conditions, participants expressed a preference for OW basal insulin, making considered trade-offs between treatment risks (e.g., risk of a severe hypoglycemic event) and convenience (e.g., frequency of administration).</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Quantifying Patient Preferences for Basal Insulin Treatments in Adults Living with Type 2 Diabetes: A Discrete Choice Experiment in Canada, Spain, France, and Japan

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年8月20日

查看全文
  • Amy M. Jones,
  • Pam Hallworth,
  • Sophi Tatlock,
  • Morten Sall Jensen,
  • Helen Kendal,
  • Sophie Wallace,
  • Elisabeth de Laguiche

摘要

Introduction

Basal insulin injections have historically been administered via once-daily (OD) or twice-daily (BD) injections. Once-weekly (OW) basal insulin injections have recently been developed. This study aimed to quantify the relative importance of the administration frequency in basal insulin treatment preferences of people living with T2D in Canada, Spain, France, and Japan, using a discrete choice experiment (DCE).

Methods

Best-practice guidelines for patient preference studies were followed in a three-phase study design. Phases one (targeted literature review) and two (qualitative interviews) informed the development of an attributes and levels grid. Phase three consisted of pilot interviews to evaluate the feasibility of preference survey completion and DCE tasks among adults living with T2D across Canada, France, Spain, and Japan. Hierarchical Bayesian estimation was used to estimate part-worth utilities for attribute levels, then calculate the relative importance of each attribute among other attributes tested.

Results

The DCE survey was completed by N = 513 participants (aged 20–90; 54% male, 45% female; mean time since diagnosis: 11.6 years). Participants were split into three treatment groups: basal insulin and injectable glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) naïve (n = 176), basal insulin naïve but with injectable GLP-1 RA experience (n = 176) and basal insulin experienced (n = 161). The administration frequency had a relative importance of 40% across the full sample, double that of any other treatment attribute tested in this study. A preference for OW administration was found relative to OD and BD. Findings were consistent across treatment groups and countries.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated the value and importance of administration frequency in making choices for basal insulin treatments when glycemic control is held constant. Per the pre-specified conditions, participants expressed a preference for OW basal insulin, making considered trade-offs between treatment risks (e.g., risk of a severe hypoglycemic event) and convenience (e.g., frequency of administration).