Scholarlink

<p>This study presents the hybrid arithmetic optimization-pattern search (HAOA-PS), an enhanced variant of the arithmetic optimizationalgorithm (AOA) technique. By evaluating several benchmark test functions and comparing implementation time and solution quality with the original arithmetic optimization technique, the suitability of this suggested hybrid strategy is examined. Next, the suggested method is used to create a multi-stage proportional-integral-derivative (MSPID) controller to control the operating frequency of distributed power generation systems. It is expected that, in terms of frequency control, the suggested hAOA-PS-based MSPID controller performs better than traditional PID controllers. The proposed hAOA-PS-based MSPID controller achieves improvements of 27.82%, 60.02%, and 65.15% compared to the AOA-based MSPID, hAOA-PS-based PID, and AOA-based PID, respectively, shown in the simulation results.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Frequency regulation of distributed power generation system via hybrid arithmetic optimization pattern search algorithm

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年3月18日

查看全文
  • Surya Narayan Sahu,
  • Rajendra Kumar Khadanga,
  • Amit Kumar Sahoo,
  • Sidhartha Panda,
  • B. Rajanarayan Prusty

摘要

This study presents the hybrid arithmetic optimization-pattern search (HAOA-PS), an enhanced variant of the arithmetic optimizationalgorithm (AOA) technique. By evaluating several benchmark test functions and comparing implementation time and solution quality with the original arithmetic optimization technique, the suitability of this suggested hybrid strategy is examined. Next, the suggested method is used to create a multi-stage proportional-integral-derivative (MSPID) controller to control the operating frequency of distributed power generation systems. It is expected that, in terms of frequency control, the suggested hAOA-PS-based MSPID controller performs better than traditional PID controllers. The proposed hAOA-PS-based MSPID controller achieves improvements of 27.82%, 60.02%, and 65.15% compared to the AOA-based MSPID, hAOA-PS-based PID, and AOA-based PID, respectively, shown in the simulation results.