Scholarlink

<p>This paper investigates existing process models for the development of Data-Driven Industrial Services (DDIS). These process models are increasingly important as the role of data in industrial asset management grows. This paper conducts a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) across six databases to address three research questions: Firstly, which existing process models are available for DDIS development? Secondly, do existing process models for DDIS development provide methods and roles for the support of their process models? Lastly, what further research can be derived from the current literature on process models for DDIS development? The findings reveal 17 process models, with eight of them based on the well-established CRoss Industry Standard Process for Data Mining (CRISP-DM). There is variability in how the process models are supported by methods and roles. In addition, the paper establishes a research agenda that addresses research gaps. This paper contributes to the broader understanding of service digitalization in the form of an overview of existing process models for DDIS development and a research agenda that leads towards enabling industrial companies to choose and apply the appropriate process models for DDIS.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Process models for the development of data-driven industrial services: insights from a systematic literature review and research agenda

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年3月4日

查看全文
  • Anna Maria Binder de Serdio,
  • Rakesh Mishra,
  • Dirk Stegelmeyer,
  • Leigh Fleming

摘要

This paper investigates existing process models for the development of Data-Driven Industrial Services (DDIS). These process models are increasingly important as the role of data in industrial asset management grows. This paper conducts a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) across six databases to address three research questions: Firstly, which existing process models are available for DDIS development? Secondly, do existing process models for DDIS development provide methods and roles for the support of their process models? Lastly, what further research can be derived from the current literature on process models for DDIS development? The findings reveal 17 process models, with eight of them based on the well-established CRoss Industry Standard Process for Data Mining (CRISP-DM). There is variability in how the process models are supported by methods and roles. In addition, the paper establishes a research agenda that addresses research gaps. This paper contributes to the broader understanding of service digitalization in the form of an overview of existing process models for DDIS development and a research agenda that leads towards enabling industrial companies to choose and apply the appropriate process models for DDIS.