<p>Despite some labeling the Hubble tension as a ‘crisis’, I argue that this tension does not endanger <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Lambda\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>CDM as a permanent contribution to scientific knowledge. Utilizing a Lakatosian framework, I argue that the <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Lambda\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>CDM model represents the latest stage in an evolving research programme characterized by empirical and theoretical progress. I further contend that plausible resolutions to the Hubble tension align with established strategies within this research programme that preserve <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Lambda\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>CDM as a highly accurate approximation. This paper concludes that both the current cosmological research programme and the <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Lambda\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>CDM branch of it are well-positioned to resolve the Hubble tension, thus mitigating concerns of an epistemic crisis.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Trouble with Hubble? A brief philosophical assessment of the \(H_0\) tension

  • William J. Wolf

摘要

Despite some labeling the Hubble tension as a ‘crisis’, I argue that this tension does not endanger \(\Lambda\) CDM as a permanent contribution to scientific knowledge. Utilizing a Lakatosian framework, I argue that the \(\Lambda\) CDM model represents the latest stage in an evolving research programme characterized by empirical and theoretical progress. I further contend that plausible resolutions to the Hubble tension align with established strategies within this research programme that preserve \(\Lambda\) CDM as a highly accurate approximation. This paper concludes that both the current cosmological research programme and the \(\Lambda\) CDM branch of it are well-positioned to resolve the Hubble tension, thus mitigating concerns of an epistemic crisis.