Scholarlink

<p>Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) became a popular and standard treatment for renal cancers in comparison with open radical nephrectomy (ORN). Between 5 May 2008 and 10 October 2023, we retrospectively reviewed 74 patients with renal cell carcinoma at the Oncology Center, Mansoura University, who were treated with either laparoscopic or open radical nephrectomy with the assessment of the surgical and postoperative outcomes and the impact of both approaches on the patient’s prognosis. The operative time in the LRN group was 166.76 ± 55.69 min and was comparable with that in the ORN group at 164.5 ± 51.68 min (<i>p</i> = 0.86). The intraoperative blood loss significantly differed between both groups with 101.47 ± 49.79 ml in the LRN group and 270.63 ± 123.22 ml in the ORN group (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). The surgical outcomes such as ambulation, starting oral intake, and in-hospital stay were statistically significant between both groups (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). We followed up with the patients within 40.74 months (range 2–279 months), and the tumor recurred in the LRN and ORN groups in 3 and 4 cases, respectively. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in comparison to open radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma has better surgical and postoperative outcomes in experienced hands and in small-sized tumors.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Laparoscopic Versus Open Radical Nephrectomy for Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年9月26日

查看全文
  • Amr Abouzid,
  • Mosab Shetiwy,
  • Mohamed Hamdy,
  • Khalid Atallah,
  • Mohamed Ezzat,
  • Mohamed Abd Elghaffar

摘要

Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) became a popular and standard treatment for renal cancers in comparison with open radical nephrectomy (ORN). Between 5 May 2008 and 10 October 2023, we retrospectively reviewed 74 patients with renal cell carcinoma at the Oncology Center, Mansoura University, who were treated with either laparoscopic or open radical nephrectomy with the assessment of the surgical and postoperative outcomes and the impact of both approaches on the patient’s prognosis. The operative time in the LRN group was 166.76 ± 55.69 min and was comparable with that in the ORN group at 164.5 ± 51.68 min (p = 0.86). The intraoperative blood loss significantly differed between both groups with 101.47 ± 49.79 ml in the LRN group and 270.63 ± 123.22 ml in the ORN group (p < 0.001). The surgical outcomes such as ambulation, starting oral intake, and in-hospital stay were statistically significant between both groups (p < 0.001). We followed up with the patients within 40.74 months (range 2–279 months), and the tumor recurred in the LRN and ORN groups in 3 and 4 cases, respectively. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in comparison to open radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma has better surgical and postoperative outcomes in experienced hands and in small-sized tumors.