Scholarlink

Introduction <p>Transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) individuals experience significant mental health disparities, yet less is known about how psychiatric labeling intersects with gender diversity within state-regulated mental health systems. This study examines how psychiatric diagnoses and gender diversity interact in the Israeli mental health system to shape vulnerability, epistemic marginalization, and care avoidance among TGD individuals with psychiatric diagnoses.</p> Methods <p>Sixteen TGD adults with psychiatric diagnoses who use public mental health and rehabilitation services participated in semi-structured in-depth interviews. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis informed by an intersectionality framework.</p> Results <p>Three interrelated patterns emerged. First, participants reported boundary violations, misgendering, involuntary outing, and sexual harassment, indicating institutional failures to protect dignity and recognition. Second, professional unpreparedness can function as a form of clinical gatekeeping, with psychiatric authority discounting patients’ self-knowledge and shaping access to care. Third, concealment and care avoidance emerged as rational responses to environments perceived as unsafe. Psychiatric labeling intensified these dynamics by reframing gender identity as symptomatic instability, further undermining credibility and engagement with services.</p> Conclusions <p>These findings suggest that harm experienced by TGD individuals with psychiatric diagnoses are embedded within authority structures and governance arrangements that shape recognition, eligibility, and access to care, rather than arising solely from interpersonal prejudice.</p> Policy Implications <p>Improving mental health equity for TGD individuals requires reforms at the level of governance and regulatory design. Policy responses should strengthen anti-discrimination enforcement, ensure documentation practices that respect affirmed gender identity, reduce excessive clinical gatekeeping in rehabilitation eligibility, and establish independent accountability mechanisms within mental health systems.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Psychiatric Authority and Gender Diversity in Mental Health Governance: Structural Vulnerability and Care Avoidance among Transgender and Gender Diverse Individuals with Psychiatric Diagnoses

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年4月18日

查看全文
  • Dr. Nati Biton

摘要

Introduction

Transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) individuals experience significant mental health disparities, yet less is known about how psychiatric labeling intersects with gender diversity within state-regulated mental health systems. This study examines how psychiatric diagnoses and gender diversity interact in the Israeli mental health system to shape vulnerability, epistemic marginalization, and care avoidance among TGD individuals with psychiatric diagnoses.

Methods

Sixteen TGD adults with psychiatric diagnoses who use public mental health and rehabilitation services participated in semi-structured in-depth interviews. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis informed by an intersectionality framework.

Results

Three interrelated patterns emerged. First, participants reported boundary violations, misgendering, involuntary outing, and sexual harassment, indicating institutional failures to protect dignity and recognition. Second, professional unpreparedness can function as a form of clinical gatekeeping, with psychiatric authority discounting patients’ self-knowledge and shaping access to care. Third, concealment and care avoidance emerged as rational responses to environments perceived as unsafe. Psychiatric labeling intensified these dynamics by reframing gender identity as symptomatic instability, further undermining credibility and engagement with services.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that harm experienced by TGD individuals with psychiatric diagnoses are embedded within authority structures and governance arrangements that shape recognition, eligibility, and access to care, rather than arising solely from interpersonal prejudice.

Policy Implications

Improving mental health equity for TGD individuals requires reforms at the level of governance and regulatory design. Policy responses should strengthen anti-discrimination enforcement, ensure documentation practices that respect affirmed gender identity, reduce excessive clinical gatekeeping in rehabilitation eligibility, and establish independent accountability mechanisms within mental health systems.