Scholarlink

Introduction <p>Adolescent dating relationships represent a critical developmental context in which beliefs about intimacy, gender roles, and power are formed and consolidated. Within this stage, coercive control often emerges in subtle and normalized forms, contributing to the persistence of gender-based violence. The present research examines the psychosocial risk factors underlying the perception of coercive control in teen dating relationships.</p> Methods <p>Participants were 357 adolescents aged between 15 and 19 years (M<sub>age</sub> = 17.83, SD<sub>age</sub> = 0.94), recruited from educational institutions during the academic year 2024/2025. A structural equation model was tested to explore the relationships among gender-related beliefs, psychological functioning, and attitudes toward intimate partner behaviors.</p> Results <p>Findings revealed a complex network of associations. The perceived precariousness of masculinity was positively associated with sexism, which predicted, in turn, stronger endorsement of rape myths and romantic love myths. These belief systems were directly related to increased legitimization of coercive control in dating relationships: in particular, adolescents who endorsed rape myths and romantic love myths were more likely to perceive controlling behaviors as acceptable or even normative. Both sexism and the perceived precariousness of masculinity showed indirect effects on this normalization process. Emotional dysregulation also emerged as a significant factor.</p> Conclusion <p>These results highlight the critical role of sociocultural and individual psychological factors in shaping adolescents’ attitudes toward abuse in dating contexts, particularly in relation to traditional gender norms and the romanticization of intimate relationships.</p> Policy Implications <p>With regard to primary prevention efforts, interventions should address sexist ideologies and unhealthy beliefs about romantic relationships, while also promoting emotion regulation skills. Specifically challenging masculine gender norms and fostering egalitarian relationship models within secondary schools may be particularly effective in reducing tolerance for coercive control and preventing teen dating violence.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Legitimizing Coercive Control in Teen Dating Relationships: Psychosocial Risk Factors in the Adolescent Population

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年3月5日

查看全文
  • Elisa Berlin,
  • Ilaria Coppola,
  • Marta Tironi,
  • Fabiola Bizzi,
  • Nadia Rania,
  • Laura Scudieri,
  • Chiara Rollero

摘要

Introduction

Adolescent dating relationships represent a critical developmental context in which beliefs about intimacy, gender roles, and power are formed and consolidated. Within this stage, coercive control often emerges in subtle and normalized forms, contributing to the persistence of gender-based violence. The present research examines the psychosocial risk factors underlying the perception of coercive control in teen dating relationships.

Methods

Participants were 357 adolescents aged between 15 and 19 years (Mage = 17.83, SDage = 0.94), recruited from educational institutions during the academic year 2024/2025. A structural equation model was tested to explore the relationships among gender-related beliefs, psychological functioning, and attitudes toward intimate partner behaviors.

Results

Findings revealed a complex network of associations. The perceived precariousness of masculinity was positively associated with sexism, which predicted, in turn, stronger endorsement of rape myths and romantic love myths. These belief systems were directly related to increased legitimization of coercive control in dating relationships: in particular, adolescents who endorsed rape myths and romantic love myths were more likely to perceive controlling behaviors as acceptable or even normative. Both sexism and the perceived precariousness of masculinity showed indirect effects on this normalization process. Emotional dysregulation also emerged as a significant factor.

Conclusion

These results highlight the critical role of sociocultural and individual psychological factors in shaping adolescents’ attitudes toward abuse in dating contexts, particularly in relation to traditional gender norms and the romanticization of intimate relationships.

Policy Implications

With regard to primary prevention efforts, interventions should address sexist ideologies and unhealthy beliefs about romantic relationships, while also promoting emotion regulation skills. Specifically challenging masculine gender norms and fostering egalitarian relationship models within secondary schools may be particularly effective in reducing tolerance for coercive control and preventing teen dating violence.