Introduction <p>Research on the role of LGBTQ + policies in the US has primarily examined how policies are associated with perceptions of LGBTQ + communities, LGBTQ + people’s experiences of discrimination, or LGBTQ + mental health. However, no research that we are aware of has examined the indirect effects of distinct LGBTQ + policies on mental health outcomes among sexual minority women and gender diverse individuals assigned female at birth (SMWGD) through sexual orientation discrimination prospectively.</p> Methods <p>We used state level data from the Movement Advancement Project in combination with baseline and follow up data from a sample of 429 SMWGD to understand associations between distinct LGBTQ + policies, anxiety, and depression through sexual orientation discrimination. Participants were recruited online August 2020 through May 2021.</p> Results <p>Only LGBTQ + nondiscrimination policies, and no other policies, were significantly associated with sexual orientation discrimination. Participants living in states with more LGBTQ + nondiscrimination policies experienced less sexual orientation discrimination at baseline, which in turn predicted less anxiety at follow-up (when controlling for anxiety at baseline). Additionally, living in states with better overall LGBTQ + policies and youth policies were associated with significantly less anxiety, but not depression or sexual orientation discrimination.</p> Conclusion <p>Results suggest that LGBTQ + policies in the US have direct and indirect effects on the mental health of SMWGD. However, we must continue to monitor the role of LGBTQ + policies on the lives of LGBTQ + community members.</p> Policy Implications <p>Policymakers should promote nondiscrimination policies and address the real-life impact of LGBTQ + polices in the lives of their LGBTQ + citizens.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

LGBTQ + Policies in the United States and Mental Health: The Mediating Role of Sexual Orientation Discrimination among Sexual Minority Women and Gender Diverse Individuals Assigned Female at Birth

  • Emily Herry,
  • Christina Dyar

摘要

Introduction

Research on the role of LGBTQ + policies in the US has primarily examined how policies are associated with perceptions of LGBTQ + communities, LGBTQ + people’s experiences of discrimination, or LGBTQ + mental health. However, no research that we are aware of has examined the indirect effects of distinct LGBTQ + policies on mental health outcomes among sexual minority women and gender diverse individuals assigned female at birth (SMWGD) through sexual orientation discrimination prospectively.

Methods

We used state level data from the Movement Advancement Project in combination with baseline and follow up data from a sample of 429 SMWGD to understand associations between distinct LGBTQ + policies, anxiety, and depression through sexual orientation discrimination. Participants were recruited online August 2020 through May 2021.

Results

Only LGBTQ + nondiscrimination policies, and no other policies, were significantly associated with sexual orientation discrimination. Participants living in states with more LGBTQ + nondiscrimination policies experienced less sexual orientation discrimination at baseline, which in turn predicted less anxiety at follow-up (when controlling for anxiety at baseline). Additionally, living in states with better overall LGBTQ + policies and youth policies were associated with significantly less anxiety, but not depression or sexual orientation discrimination.

Conclusion

Results suggest that LGBTQ + policies in the US have direct and indirect effects on the mental health of SMWGD. However, we must continue to monitor the role of LGBTQ + policies on the lives of LGBTQ + community members.

Policy Implications

Policymakers should promote nondiscrimination policies and address the real-life impact of LGBTQ + polices in the lives of their LGBTQ + citizens.