Introduction <p>Academic scholarship on workplace sexual harassment has revealed vast differences in workplace-sexual-harassment victimization by individuals’ binary gender. However, fewer scholarly contributions have examined how victimization is patterned by other personal traits. This study provides a novel theoretical and empirical account of differences in sexual-harassment victimization and reporting by LGBTQ + status.</p> Methods <p>We generate novel evidence on these processes by drawing on unique data from the 2022 Australian Workplace Equality Index (AWEI) Employee Survey (<i>n</i> = 44,939 overall; 9806 LGBTQ +) and multivariable regression models.</p> Results <p>Our analyses reveal elevated risks of workplace-sexual-harassment victimization amongst LGBTQ + individuals, all else being equal. Victimization rates are particularly high amongst pansexual, queer, bisexual and gender-non-binary employees assigned female at birth. However, we observe few differences in the reporting of sexual-harassment experiences or in satisfaction with post-reporting employer actions.</p> Conclusions <p>LGBTQ + individuals are disproportionately exposed to workplace sexual harassment, particularly those who were assigned female and birth.</p> Policy Implications <p>Our findings underscore the need for continued investment in programs aimed at mitigating workplace sexual harassment and to ensure such programs operate hand-in-hand with LGBTQ + diversity-and-inclusion initiatives.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Reproducing the Hetero-Masculine Order at Work: The Sexual Harassment of LGBTQ + Employees

  • Francisco Perales,
  • Alice Campbell,
  • Nicki Elkin

摘要

Introduction

Academic scholarship on workplace sexual harassment has revealed vast differences in workplace-sexual-harassment victimization by individuals’ binary gender. However, fewer scholarly contributions have examined how victimization is patterned by other personal traits. This study provides a novel theoretical and empirical account of differences in sexual-harassment victimization and reporting by LGBTQ + status.

Methods

We generate novel evidence on these processes by drawing on unique data from the 2022 Australian Workplace Equality Index (AWEI) Employee Survey (n = 44,939 overall; 9806 LGBTQ +) and multivariable regression models.

Results

Our analyses reveal elevated risks of workplace-sexual-harassment victimization amongst LGBTQ + individuals, all else being equal. Victimization rates are particularly high amongst pansexual, queer, bisexual and gender-non-binary employees assigned female at birth. However, we observe few differences in the reporting of sexual-harassment experiences or in satisfaction with post-reporting employer actions.

Conclusions

LGBTQ + individuals are disproportionately exposed to workplace sexual harassment, particularly those who were assigned female and birth.

Policy Implications

Our findings underscore the need for continued investment in programs aimed at mitigating workplace sexual harassment and to ensure such programs operate hand-in-hand with LGBTQ + diversity-and-inclusion initiatives.