Scholarlink

Introduction <p>The acceptance of LGBTQ+ communities remains under pressure. Although research on their experiences has grown, major questions remain on the impact of the broader context in which people live and the diversity within LGBTQ+ communities. Thereby, zooming in on systematic comparative survey research, we currently know more about homosexual men in big cities than other communities and groups, particularly gender minorities, and how they are affected by their social environments. This study is one of the first large-n studies to systematically study how the degree of urbanization and the presence of allies in one’s environment shape experienced social acceptance of cis-gay, cis-lesbian, cis-bi, transgender, and nonbinary persons.</p> Methods <p>We used survey data from 2023 and analyzed 2000 LGBTQ+ individuals using multilevel models.</p> Results <p>LGBTQ+ people experience greater acceptance in more urban living environments than rural living environments, but the presence of supportive families and friends and especially supportive local governments can close this urban–rural gap. Simultaneously, cisgender lesbian and gay people do not fare worse in rural living areas than urban centers, and especially, nonbinary people in rural environments can benefit from institutional allies.</p> Conclusions <p>Acceptance is generally higher in more urban living areas, but strong social and institutional support can improve experiences in rural areas, particularly for nonbinary individuals.</p> Policy Implications <p>Especially in places that enshrine the cisgender-heteronormative norms, people who deviate more experience less acceptance. However, (institutional) allies can make all the difference, emphasizing the urgency of support from local governments.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Where Allies Matter Most: How Urbanization, Formal and Informal Support Shape Experienced Acceptance of Different LGBTQ+ Subcommunities

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年7月16日

查看全文
  • Marleen Hasselt,
  • Niels Spierings,
  • Saskia Glas

摘要

Introduction

The acceptance of LGBTQ+ communities remains under pressure. Although research on their experiences has grown, major questions remain on the impact of the broader context in which people live and the diversity within LGBTQ+ communities. Thereby, zooming in on systematic comparative survey research, we currently know more about homosexual men in big cities than other communities and groups, particularly gender minorities, and how they are affected by their social environments. This study is one of the first large-n studies to systematically study how the degree of urbanization and the presence of allies in one’s environment shape experienced social acceptance of cis-gay, cis-lesbian, cis-bi, transgender, and nonbinary persons.

Methods

We used survey data from 2023 and analyzed 2000 LGBTQ+ individuals using multilevel models.

Results

LGBTQ+ people experience greater acceptance in more urban living environments than rural living environments, but the presence of supportive families and friends and especially supportive local governments can close this urban–rural gap. Simultaneously, cisgender lesbian and gay people do not fare worse in rural living areas than urban centers, and especially, nonbinary people in rural environments can benefit from institutional allies.

Conclusions

Acceptance is generally higher in more urban living areas, but strong social and institutional support can improve experiences in rural areas, particularly for nonbinary individuals.

Policy Implications

Especially in places that enshrine the cisgender-heteronormative norms, people who deviate more experience less acceptance. However, (institutional) allies can make all the difference, emphasizing the urgency of support from local governments.