<p>Rapid wetland assessments are designed to require minimal field effort (e.g. half-day site visit), but still provide critical information on wetland ecological condition and functioning. Many wetland functions occur within or are supported by the soil, yet soil condition is seldom–or only minimally–included in most state rapid assessments. We focus on the Ohio Rapid Assessment Method for wetlands (ORAM) and evaluate soil bulk density as an indicator of wetland soil condition that can be incorporated into rapid wetland assessments. Soil bulk density (<InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\varvec{\rho }_{\varvec{b}}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>) is relatively easy to measure and requires only basic instrumentation. It also correlates well with more intensive metrics of soil condition (e.g. carbon content, aggregation). We sampled 45 wetlands in west–central Ohio, that exhibited a range of wetland type and ecological condition. From each wetland, we collected five soil cores (to 15-cm depth) and then analyzed the soil samples for <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\varvec{\rho }_{\varvec{b}}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, carbon content, and water-stable aggregates. These three measurements were used to develop a four-bin <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\varvec{\rho }_{\varvec{b}}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> metric of soil condition. Incorporating this metric into the current ORAM improved relationships with <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\varvec{\rho }_{\varvec{b}}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> (<i>r</i>&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.48 to <i>r</i>&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.58) and soil condition (<i>r</i>&#xa0;=&#xa0;-0.53 to <i>r</i>&#xa0;=&#xa0;-0.64). Additional gains could be achieved with higher weighting of the <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\varvec{\rho }_{\varvec{b}}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> metric. Alternatively, the current scoring system could be left intact, but protection of wetlands with high quality soils ensured by providing special status when <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\varvec{\rho }_{\varvec{b}}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is less than 0.40&#xa0;g&#xa0;cm<InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^{\varvec{-3}}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> (highest quality) or less than 0.73&#xa0;g&#xa0;cm<InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^{\varvec{-3}}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> (high quality).</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

A Soil Bulk Density Metric to Improve Rapid Assessment of Wetland Condition

  • Katie Hossler,
  • James Tyler Retherford,
  • Mitchell Link

摘要

Rapid wetland assessments are designed to require minimal field effort (e.g. half-day site visit), but still provide critical information on wetland ecological condition and functioning. Many wetland functions occur within or are supported by the soil, yet soil condition is seldom–or only minimally–included in most state rapid assessments. We focus on the Ohio Rapid Assessment Method for wetlands (ORAM) and evaluate soil bulk density as an indicator of wetland soil condition that can be incorporated into rapid wetland assessments. Soil bulk density ( \(\varvec{\rho }_{\varvec{b}}\) ) is relatively easy to measure and requires only basic instrumentation. It also correlates well with more intensive metrics of soil condition (e.g. carbon content, aggregation). We sampled 45 wetlands in west–central Ohio, that exhibited a range of wetland type and ecological condition. From each wetland, we collected five soil cores (to 15-cm depth) and then analyzed the soil samples for \(\varvec{\rho }_{\varvec{b}}\) , carbon content, and water-stable aggregates. These three measurements were used to develop a four-bin \(\varvec{\rho }_{\varvec{b}}\) metric of soil condition. Incorporating this metric into the current ORAM improved relationships with \(\varvec{\rho }_{\varvec{b}}\) (r = 0.48 to r = 0.58) and soil condition (r = -0.53 to r = -0.64). Additional gains could be achieved with higher weighting of the \(\varvec{\rho }_{\varvec{b}}\) metric. Alternatively, the current scoring system could be left intact, but protection of wetlands with high quality soils ensured by providing special status when \(\varvec{\rho }_{\varvec{b}}\) is less than 0.40 g cm \(^{\varvec{-3}}\) (highest quality) or less than 0.73 g cm \(^{\varvec{-3}}\) (high quality).