<p>The purpose of this study is to provide empirical evidence on the economic effectiveness of government measures in response to the COVID-19 crisis in OECD countries. We use the likelihood ratio panel probit model for 30 OECD countries with a monthly frequency from January 2020 to March 2021. We study the response of the interest rate, unemployment rate, and total industry output index to different types of government actions, including the economic support index, workplace closures, and public transportation shutdown, among others. The results show that the measures taken by governments to combat COVID-19, while saving lives, are not as effective as hoped in supporting the economy. The results highlight that economic support measures fail to reduce unemployment while preventing a free fall in the interest rate and the industrial production index. We conclude that a local industrial strategy is a starting point for addressing inequality and rebuilding a labour market more resilient to future crisis. Thinking holistically about smart industrial policies, capable of reallocating resources to specific key sectors (such as healthcare), will contribute to long-term economic resilience and growth, as well as creating conditions for sustainability.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Effectiveness of Government Measures Against COVID-19 Pandemic in OECD Countries

  • Ines Abdelkafi,
  • Youssra Ben Romdhane,
  • Sahar Loukil

摘要

The purpose of this study is to provide empirical evidence on the economic effectiveness of government measures in response to the COVID-19 crisis in OECD countries. We use the likelihood ratio panel probit model for 30 OECD countries with a monthly frequency from January 2020 to March 2021. We study the response of the interest rate, unemployment rate, and total industry output index to different types of government actions, including the economic support index, workplace closures, and public transportation shutdown, among others. The results show that the measures taken by governments to combat COVID-19, while saving lives, are not as effective as hoped in supporting the economy. The results highlight that economic support measures fail to reduce unemployment while preventing a free fall in the interest rate and the industrial production index. We conclude that a local industrial strategy is a starting point for addressing inequality and rebuilding a labour market more resilient to future crisis. Thinking holistically about smart industrial policies, capable of reallocating resources to specific key sectors (such as healthcare), will contribute to long-term economic resilience and growth, as well as creating conditions for sustainability.