Scholarlink

Purpose <p>Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) is driven by complex interactions between genetic mutations and epigenetic dysregulation. While alterations in chromatin modifiers are frequent, the precise downstream transcriptional networks they enable and how these networks execute the leukemogenic program remain incompletely defined.</p> Methods <p>We employed an integrative bioinformatics strategy. Transcriptomic data from GSE84881 (AML stromal cells) and GSE9476 (AML blasts) identified differentially expressed genes, refined via GeneCards and CellMarker to a 32-gene AML signature. Functional enrichment (GO/KEGG) and protein-protein interaction (PPI) network analyses followed. Core hubs were validated for spatial (single-cell t-SNE) and subtype-specific expression using the Hematologic Malignancy database. Perturbation analysis (GPSAdb2.0 BioTrigger) expanded the network, with pathway enrichment on responsive genes.</p> Results <p>The 32-gene signature enriched strongly in hematopoietic differentiation and unexpectedly in cross-lineage developmental pathways (e.g., gland, epithelial development). PPI topology revealed nine hubs: AFF1, TAL1, IKZF1, GATA1, NOTCH1, BCL2, IL1B, IRF4, ZAP70. Single-cell t-SNE showed distinct, non-overlapping localization patterns among AML subpopulations; box plots demonstrated marked expression heterogeneity across 26 molecular subtypes. Perturbation of these hubs generated a 500-gene set whose KEGG enrichment highlighted three interconnected layers: (i) Polycomb repression and ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling (epigenetic gatekeepers), (ii) FoxO signaling, cell cycle, and senescence (core oncogenic pathways), and (iii) broad cancer hallmarks including endocrine resistance and diverse solid tumor pathways.</p> Conclusion <p>We propose a hierarchical pathomechanism: synergistic dysfunction in chromatin remodeling and Polycomb-mediated repression establishes a permissive epigenomic landscape, enabling activation of an oncogenic transcriptional network (centered on AFF1, TAL1, IKZF1, GATA1). This network then hijacks TP53/FoxO signaling to drive cell cycle escape, apoptosis resistance, and metabolic adaptation. Our findings unify disparate molecular lesions into a coherent axis and suggest new therapeutic nodes.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

An integrated multi-omics analysis reveals a core epigenetically-activated transcriptional network driving oncogenic signaling in acute myeloid leukemia

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年5月30日

查看全文
  • Lihua Zeng,
  • Haohao Lei,
  • Jingnan Bi,
  • Guowei Run,
  • Bizhen Yu,
  • Linhua Ji

摘要

Purpose

Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) is driven by complex interactions between genetic mutations and epigenetic dysregulation. While alterations in chromatin modifiers are frequent, the precise downstream transcriptional networks they enable and how these networks execute the leukemogenic program remain incompletely defined.

Methods

We employed an integrative bioinformatics strategy. Transcriptomic data from GSE84881 (AML stromal cells) and GSE9476 (AML blasts) identified differentially expressed genes, refined via GeneCards and CellMarker to a 32-gene AML signature. Functional enrichment (GO/KEGG) and protein-protein interaction (PPI) network analyses followed. Core hubs were validated for spatial (single-cell t-SNE) and subtype-specific expression using the Hematologic Malignancy database. Perturbation analysis (GPSAdb2.0 BioTrigger) expanded the network, with pathway enrichment on responsive genes.

Results

The 32-gene signature enriched strongly in hematopoietic differentiation and unexpectedly in cross-lineage developmental pathways (e.g., gland, epithelial development). PPI topology revealed nine hubs: AFF1, TAL1, IKZF1, GATA1, NOTCH1, BCL2, IL1B, IRF4, ZAP70. Single-cell t-SNE showed distinct, non-overlapping localization patterns among AML subpopulations; box plots demonstrated marked expression heterogeneity across 26 molecular subtypes. Perturbation of these hubs generated a 500-gene set whose KEGG enrichment highlighted three interconnected layers: (i) Polycomb repression and ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling (epigenetic gatekeepers), (ii) FoxO signaling, cell cycle, and senescence (core oncogenic pathways), and (iii) broad cancer hallmarks including endocrine resistance and diverse solid tumor pathways.

Conclusion

We propose a hierarchical pathomechanism: synergistic dysfunction in chromatin remodeling and Polycomb-mediated repression establishes a permissive epigenomic landscape, enabling activation of an oncogenic transcriptional network (centered on AFF1, TAL1, IKZF1, GATA1). This network then hijacks TP53/FoxO signaling to drive cell cycle escape, apoptosis resistance, and metabolic adaptation. Our findings unify disparate molecular lesions into a coherent axis and suggest new therapeutic nodes.