<p>This commentary develops a reciprocal pedagogy of attention for Islamic religious education (IRE) by bringing the account of mindfulness and religiosity offered by Henning et al.&#xa0;(<CitationRef CitationID="CR12">2025</CitationRef>) into dialogue with Aldbyani’s theological account of Islamic mindfulness and the mapping of Islamic mindfulness by Aldbyani and Al-Harbi. It argues that mindfulness-related practices prepare attentional availability and offer accessible tools for pausing, noticing, and interrupting automatic reactions, while IRE strengthens, interprets, and directs that awareness through theological vocabulary, ritual continuity, relational ethics, and divine telos. Rather than treating Islamic mindfulness as a separate psychological construct or as a rival to mindfulness, the article reframes their relationship as an intentionally asymmetrical but pedagogically reciprocal classroom sequence. It develops four integrated reframings—pedagogical translation, relational responsibility, ritual-pedagogical continuity, and existential specificity. The article extends tradition-responsive mindfulness pedagogy by arguing that religious and contemplative concepts become educationally formative when they are also connected to learners’ lived conditions, capacities, and needs.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

A Socially Grounded Reciprocal Pedagogy of Attention in Islamic Religious Education: A Commentary on Mindfulness, Islamic Mindfulness, and Religiosity

  • Moh Yasir Alimi

摘要

This commentary develops a reciprocal pedagogy of attention for Islamic religious education (IRE) by bringing the account of mindfulness and religiosity offered by Henning et al. (2025) into dialogue with Aldbyani’s theological account of Islamic mindfulness and the mapping of Islamic mindfulness by Aldbyani and Al-Harbi. It argues that mindfulness-related practices prepare attentional availability and offer accessible tools for pausing, noticing, and interrupting automatic reactions, while IRE strengthens, interprets, and directs that awareness through theological vocabulary, ritual continuity, relational ethics, and divine telos. Rather than treating Islamic mindfulness as a separate psychological construct or as a rival to mindfulness, the article reframes their relationship as an intentionally asymmetrical but pedagogically reciprocal classroom sequence. It develops four integrated reframings—pedagogical translation, relational responsibility, ritual-pedagogical continuity, and existential specificity. The article extends tradition-responsive mindfulness pedagogy by arguing that religious and contemplative concepts become educationally formative when they are also connected to learners’ lived conditions, capacities, and needs.