Scholarlink

<p>Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming traditional organizational structures, challenging established leadership paradigms, and reshaping human–machine collaboration in the workplace. As automated leadership agents gain prominence, understanding their expected role and contextual application becomes crucial. Based on 24 qualitative interviews with leaders (31&#xa0;h total) and three focus groups with employees (4.5&#xa0;h), this study explores the role integration and application context of automated leadership agents in traditional organizations. Our findings reveal that automated leadership agents are expected to assume multiple roles, such as <i>algorithmic authority</i>, <i>collaborative co-leader</i>, <i>automated leader-assistant</i>, and <i>obedient operator</i>, within the same organizational environment and are positioned in middle management. These role expectations introduce a high risk of role conflict and ambiguity. The findings contribute to a more nuanced understanding and offer practical guidance for traditional organizations aiming to integrate automated leadership agents successfully.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Beyond stuck in the middle: Application context and role integration of automated leadership in traditional organizations

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年4月9日

查看全文
  • Annabel Jünke,
  • Frederik Möller

摘要

Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming traditional organizational structures, challenging established leadership paradigms, and reshaping human–machine collaboration in the workplace. As automated leadership agents gain prominence, understanding their expected role and contextual application becomes crucial. Based on 24 qualitative interviews with leaders (31 h total) and three focus groups with employees (4.5 h), this study explores the role integration and application context of automated leadership agents in traditional organizations. Our findings reveal that automated leadership agents are expected to assume multiple roles, such as algorithmic authority, collaborative co-leader, automated leader-assistant, and obedient operator, within the same organizational environment and are positioned in middle management. These role expectations introduce a high risk of role conflict and ambiguity. The findings contribute to a more nuanced understanding and offer practical guidance for traditional organizations aiming to integrate automated leadership agents successfully.