Scholarlink

<p>The rapid adoption of generative AI by content creators, coupled with the emergence of legal requirements for labeling AI-generated content, raises important questions about the implications of AI on user engagement on social media platforms. We examine how the&#xa0;level&#xa0;of AI involvement (human-created, AI-enhanced, or AI-generated), content type (emotional or rational), and disclosure timing (early or late) impact user engagement through two online experiments (study 1: <i>n</i> = 325; study 2: <i>n</i> = 371) conducted via the crowdsourcing platform Prolific. Participants (mean age = 35&#xa0;years; 55% female) were asked to view Instagram profiles containing visual content labeled as human-created, AI-enhanced, or AI-generated. The results show that labeling content as AI-generated or AI-enhanced reduced both affective and behavioral engagement compared to human-created content, particularly for emotional content. Late disclosure of AI involvement improved affective engagement for AI-enhanced content, but not for&#xa0;AI-generated content. These findings deepen the understanding of algorithmic aversion in the context of generative AI and offer practical guidance for creators and platforms navigating the tension between transparency and engagement in an increasingly AI-mediated content ecosystem.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

AI content labeling and user engagement on social media: The role of AI level, content type, and disclosure timing

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年3月24日

查看全文
  • Freya Seeger,
  • Michael Wessel,
  • Christiane Lehrer

摘要

The rapid adoption of generative AI by content creators, coupled with the emergence of legal requirements for labeling AI-generated content, raises important questions about the implications of AI on user engagement on social media platforms. We examine how the level of AI involvement (human-created, AI-enhanced, or AI-generated), content type (emotional or rational), and disclosure timing (early or late) impact user engagement through two online experiments (study 1: n = 325; study 2: n = 371) conducted via the crowdsourcing platform Prolific. Participants (mean age = 35 years; 55% female) were asked to view Instagram profiles containing visual content labeled as human-created, AI-enhanced, or AI-generated. The results show that labeling content as AI-generated or AI-enhanced reduced both affective and behavioral engagement compared to human-created content, particularly for emotional content. Late disclosure of AI involvement improved affective engagement for AI-enhanced content, but not for AI-generated content. These findings deepen the understanding of algorithmic aversion in the context of generative AI and offer practical guidance for creators and platforms navigating the tension between transparency and engagement in an increasingly AI-mediated content ecosystem.