Scholarlink

Background <p>While international evidence suggests seasonal variations may influence outcomes of interventions for pediatric obesity, data for Aotearoa&#xa0;New Zealand are limited. We examined seasonal variations in changes in body mass index standard deviation score (BMI SDS) in young people with obesity enrolled in an intervention programme.</p> Methods <p>We studied 397 children and adolescents (median = 10.1&#xa0;years; range 3.7–16.8&#xa0;years) from Whānau Pakari, a multidisciplinary community-based healthy lifestyle programme (initially a randomised clinical trial that subsequently transitioned into the regional childhood obesity service). Participants were stratified by season at entry and 6-month BMI SDS changes (Δ) were evaluated. Lifestyle factors were also assessed. Data were analysed using traditional linear models and machine learning (random forest).</p> Results <p>68% of participants had BMI SDS reductions at 6&#xa0;months (mean = − 0.16 SDS; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.0001). Linear models showed seasonal variations in programme effectiveness, with BMI SDS reductions among summer (− 0.17 SDS), autumn (− 0.19 SDS) and winter (− 0.18 SDS) but not among&#xa0;spring entrants. Random forest modelling identified higher baseline BMI SDS and younger age as the most influential predictors of greater 6-month reductions in BMI SDS. Season of entry was more important than any single lifestyle factor; spring entrants exhibited attenuated reductions relative to other seasons.</p> Conclusions <p>The season at programme entry was an important factor associated with intervention effectiveness. Spring entry was associated with attenuated BMI SDS reductions, likely due to the inclusion of the&#xa0;summer holidays&#xa0;within the 6-month intervention. These findings highlight the need for targeted support during such unstructured periods to improve participant outcomes.</p> Graphical abstract <p></p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Seasonal variation in BMI outcomes at 6 months: secondary analyses of a multidisciplinary healthy lifestyle programme for children and adolescents with obesity

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年2月6日

查看全文
  • José G. B. Derraik,
  • Kima T. Costelloe,
  • Cervantée E. K. Wild,
  • Lisa E. Wynter,
  • Mohammad Shahbaz,
  • Paul L. Hofman,
  • Yvonne C. Anderson

摘要

Background

While international evidence suggests seasonal variations may influence outcomes of interventions for pediatric obesity, data for Aotearoa New Zealand are limited. We examined seasonal variations in changes in body mass index standard deviation score (BMI SDS) in young people with obesity enrolled in an intervention programme.

Methods

We studied 397 children and adolescents (median = 10.1 years; range 3.7–16.8 years) from Whānau Pakari, a multidisciplinary community-based healthy lifestyle programme (initially a randomised clinical trial that subsequently transitioned into the regional childhood obesity service). Participants were stratified by season at entry and 6-month BMI SDS changes (Δ) were evaluated. Lifestyle factors were also assessed. Data were analysed using traditional linear models and machine learning (random forest).

Results

68% of participants had BMI SDS reductions at 6 months (mean = − 0.16 SDS; P < 0.0001). Linear models showed seasonal variations in programme effectiveness, with BMI SDS reductions among summer (− 0.17 SDS), autumn (− 0.19 SDS) and winter (− 0.18 SDS) but not among spring entrants. Random forest modelling identified higher baseline BMI SDS and younger age as the most influential predictors of greater 6-month reductions in BMI SDS. Season of entry was more important than any single lifestyle factor; spring entrants exhibited attenuated reductions relative to other seasons.

Conclusions

The season at programme entry was an important factor associated with intervention effectiveness. Spring entry was associated with attenuated BMI SDS reductions, likely due to the inclusion of the summer holidays within the 6-month intervention. These findings highlight the need for targeted support during such unstructured periods to improve participant outcomes.

Graphical abstract