Scholarlink

Background <p>Urine output (UO) is a&#xa0;key clinical parameter for assessing hemodynamic status, yet manual UO measurements are labour-intensive, and documentation is often incomplete and error-prone. The Gravity of Flow study evaluated an in-house developed urine production gauge (UPG), designed as a&#xa0;reusable-cost system compatible with standard urine bags for automatic, continuous UO measurement and Electronic Health Record (EHR) integration.</p> Methods <p>This single-centre observational study enrolled 25&#xa0;cardiology patients (519 h) with indwelling urine catheters. To assess completeness and volume accuracy, UPG performance was compared against standard manual urine charting and a&#xa0;24-hour container (gold standard).</p> Results <p>The UPG achieved superior median completeness compared to manual charting (100% vs.&#xa0;40%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). The device demonstrated high accuracy (median absolute percentage error 2.3%) and minimal bias (median −3 mL), meeting ±5% equivalence criteria (78.3% within bounds). In contrast, manual charting failed to meet equivalence. Performance of the UPG remained consistent across various UO flow rates.</p> Conclusion <p>By providing superior, automated UO data (accuracy, completeness, reliability), the UPG has the potential to optimise fluid management, enable earlier intervention, and reduce nursing workload. Future research should validate these benefits across various clinical settings and over longer periods.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Automated monitoring of urine output in hospitalized patients with indwelling urinary catheters: a clinical evaluation on the cardiology ward

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年4月8日

查看全文
  • Jos Perdeck,
  • Gilmer A. Sussenbach,
  • Elliot N. Bradshaw,
  • Ingeborg K. Go,
  • Reinoud E. Knops,
  • Tom F. Brouwer

摘要

Background

Urine output (UO) is a key clinical parameter for assessing hemodynamic status, yet manual UO measurements are labour-intensive, and documentation is often incomplete and error-prone. The Gravity of Flow study evaluated an in-house developed urine production gauge (UPG), designed as a reusable-cost system compatible with standard urine bags for automatic, continuous UO measurement and Electronic Health Record (EHR) integration.

Methods

This single-centre observational study enrolled 25 cardiology patients (519 h) with indwelling urine catheters. To assess completeness and volume accuracy, UPG performance was compared against standard manual urine charting and a 24-hour container (gold standard).

Results

The UPG achieved superior median completeness compared to manual charting (100% vs. 40%, p < 0.001). The device demonstrated high accuracy (median absolute percentage error 2.3%) and minimal bias (median −3 mL), meeting ±5% equivalence criteria (78.3% within bounds). In contrast, manual charting failed to meet equivalence. Performance of the UPG remained consistent across various UO flow rates.

Conclusion

By providing superior, automated UO data (accuracy, completeness, reliability), the UPG has the potential to optimise fluid management, enable earlier intervention, and reduce nursing workload. Future research should validate these benefits across various clinical settings and over longer periods.