Scholarlink

<p>This article examines the origins and legacy of the 1975 CSCE in Europe in light of current calls for a&#xa0;“CSCE&#xa0;2.0.” It argues that the CSCE was not a&#xa0;binding security system but a&#xa0;product of Cold War conditions, whose strength lay in political dialogue rather than legal commitments. The Helsinki Final Act initiated a&#xa0;process that culminated in the 1990 Charter of Paris. Its successor, the OSCE, was unable to preserve this consensus. A&#xa0;new Helsinki process therefore remains illusory, though historically instructive.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Die KSZE und die Grenzen internationaler Zusammenarbeit: Warum ein neues „Helsinki“ ein Luftschloss ist

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年3月11日

查看全文
  • Werner Schönleber

摘要

This article examines the origins and legacy of the 1975 CSCE in Europe in light of current calls for a “CSCE 2.0.” It argues that the CSCE was not a binding security system but a product of Cold War conditions, whose strength lay in political dialogue rather than legal commitments. The Helsinki Final Act initiated a process that culminated in the 1990 Charter of Paris. Its successor, the OSCE, was unable to preserve this consensus. A new Helsinki process therefore remains illusory, though historically instructive.