Scholarlink

<p>This article examines the semioethical framework proposed by Susan Petrilli and Augusto Ponzio in “Biosemiotics, Global Semiotics and Semioethics”, focusing on its integration of physiosemiosis—sign processes occurring in the inorganic realm—into the broader semiotic and ethical discourse. While their work advances a critical perspective on anthropocentrism and the commodification of communication, it leaves unresolved the ethical tensions between animal ethics and ecological ethics. By incorporating the concept of <i>response-ability</i> and extending semioethics toward <i>physiophilia</i>, this paper argues for a more inclusive ethical paradigm that encompasses hyperobjects, ecosystems, and non-traditional semiotic entities.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Physiophilia and Semioethics: A Revised Perspective on Semiotic Response-Ability

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年5月27日

查看全文
  • Nicola Zengiaro

摘要

This article examines the semioethical framework proposed by Susan Petrilli and Augusto Ponzio in “Biosemiotics, Global Semiotics and Semioethics”, focusing on its integration of physiosemiosis—sign processes occurring in the inorganic realm—into the broader semiotic and ethical discourse. While their work advances a critical perspective on anthropocentrism and the commodification of communication, it leaves unresolved the ethical tensions between animal ethics and ecological ethics. By incorporating the concept of response-ability and extending semioethics toward physiophilia, this paper argues for a more inclusive ethical paradigm that encompasses hyperobjects, ecosystems, and non-traditional semiotic entities.