<p>This article is a response to G.M. Burghardt (Biosemiotics, 17(2):387–406, 2024): ‘Jakob von Uexküll, Heterophenomenology, and Behavior Systems i: Core Ethology and Merleau-Ponty’. I discuss (with an example taken from the equine welfare literature) why Burghardt’s concept of ‘heterophenomenology’ is an important one for animal welfare science, as well as having a broader relevance to the field of ethology. I also suggest paradigms by which heterophenomenology could be incorporated into applied animal welfare studies, promoting an interdisciplinary approach to both animal welfare research, and the practical implementation of welfare management strategies derived from applied welfare science.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

A Response to Burghardt (2024): Why Heterophenomenology Could Improve Animal Welfare

  • Amelia Lewis

摘要

This article is a response to G.M. Burghardt (Biosemiotics, 17(2):387–406, 2024): ‘Jakob von Uexküll, Heterophenomenology, and Behavior Systems i: Core Ethology and Merleau-Ponty’. I discuss (with an example taken from the equine welfare literature) why Burghardt’s concept of ‘heterophenomenology’ is an important one for animal welfare science, as well as having a broader relevance to the field of ethology. I also suggest paradigms by which heterophenomenology could be incorporated into applied animal welfare studies, promoting an interdisciplinary approach to both animal welfare research, and the practical implementation of welfare management strategies derived from applied welfare science.