Scholarlink

Abstract <p>This paper presents the second part of the NUMISHEET 2025 scientific benchmark on elasto-plastic constitutive modeling. The study builds on the experimental dataset and benchmark problem definition introduced in Part I. It evaluates 19 blind prediction results submitted by 17 international teams from academia and industry. The benchmark task included calibrating constitutive models for the dual-phase steel DP800HHE, exclusively based on Part I data. The calibrated constitutive models were used to simulate the validation experiment MUC-Test, without prior access to the experimental validation results. The submitted solutions span a broad spectrum of modeling strategies, ranging from different phenomenological hardening models and yield locus formulations to crystal plasticity approaches. A systematic comparison with experimental ground truth data (comprising punch force-displacement curves and local strain distributions) was conducted using normalized error metrics. The results of this study reveal the characteristic strengths and limitations of different modeling approaches. They also highlight the role of anisotropy and hardening law selection. Furthermore, they demonstrate the sensitivity of predictions to calibration strategies. Providing an open dataset, a transparent evaluation methodology, and a comprehensive discussion of outcomes signifies an advancement in reproducibility and objectivity in constitutive modeling. This benchmark serves as a basis for further validation, comparison, and development of constitutive models.</p> Dataset <p><a href="https://syncandshare.lrz.de/getlink/fiT1PGujcbvDnv4GDqwMQ1/">https://zenodo.org/records/18431261</a></p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

A scientific benchmark for elasto-plastic constitutive modeling - Part II: blind predictions, calibration strategies, and benchmark results

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年2月25日

查看全文
  • Lorenz Maier,
  • Erik Walz,
  • Michael Hofmann,
  • Joana Rebelo Kornmeier,
  • Rongfei Juan,
  • Junhe Lian,
  • Youngung Jeong,
  • Bohye Jeon,
  • Martin Milch,
  • Alper Güner,
  • Emad Maawad,
  • Wolfram Volk,
  • Christoph Hartmann

摘要

Abstract

This paper presents the second part of the NUMISHEET 2025 scientific benchmark on elasto-plastic constitutive modeling. The study builds on the experimental dataset and benchmark problem definition introduced in Part I. It evaluates 19 blind prediction results submitted by 17 international teams from academia and industry. The benchmark task included calibrating constitutive models for the dual-phase steel DP800HHE, exclusively based on Part I data. The calibrated constitutive models were used to simulate the validation experiment MUC-Test, without prior access to the experimental validation results. The submitted solutions span a broad spectrum of modeling strategies, ranging from different phenomenological hardening models and yield locus formulations to crystal plasticity approaches. A systematic comparison with experimental ground truth data (comprising punch force-displacement curves and local strain distributions) was conducted using normalized error metrics. The results of this study reveal the characteristic strengths and limitations of different modeling approaches. They also highlight the role of anisotropy and hardening law selection. Furthermore, they demonstrate the sensitivity of predictions to calibration strategies. Providing an open dataset, a transparent evaluation methodology, and a comprehensive discussion of outcomes signifies an advancement in reproducibility and objectivity in constitutive modeling. This benchmark serves as a basis for further validation, comparison, and development of constitutive models.

Dataset

https://zenodo.org/records/18431261