<p>The placement of dredged sediment on salt marshes, often termed “thin layer placement” (TLP), is a promising strategy to offset elevation loss and combat marsh degradation. However, inconsistent terminology, reporting practices, and lack of standardized quantitative success criteria hinder synthesis and guidance development. To address these gaps, we reviewed 89 TLP-related papers, reports, and other documents to evaluate reporting conventions and identify opportunities for standardization. Our analysis revealed substantial variability in methodology and reporting, limiting cross-project comparisons and other meta-analysis. For example, 57% and 50% of projects did not report initial marsh elevations or tidal range, respectively, which are metrics critical for interpreting flood frequency and elevation targets. Few projects clearly stated quantitative goals or success criteria, often relying on generalized objectives such as “ecological uplift,” which provide little insight into design applicability. Regional differences in placement thickness further complicate comparisons, as ecological conditions and sediment availability vary widely. Based on these findings, eight recommendations were proposed to improve clarity and comparability: (1) explicitly report project goals and link them to monitoring metrics; (2) define success criteria; (3) use consistent terminology referencing sediment placement; (4) report placement depth, range, and initial elevations; (5) include local tidal range and datum; (6) clarify controls versus references; (7) consider longer monitoring timeframes; and (8) share comprehensive results beyond peer-reviewed summaries. Adoption of these practices will enhance transparency, facilitate meta-analysis, and support evidence-based design and evaluation of future TLP projects.</p>