<p>In this study, we present a coupled, dimensional energy-balance model enhanced with machine-learning validation to predict residual-velocity curves and ballistic limits of fiber-reinforced composites. Projectile deceleration is described as a three-term balance involving strength-like, drag-like, and inertial effects, mapped to the nondimensional groups <i>Π₀</i>, <i>Π₁</i>, and <i>Π₂</i>; closed-form and RK4 solutions yield residual velocity and regime boundaries (<i>Π</i>₀ = <i>Π</i>₁, <i>Π</i>₁ = <i>Π</i>₂). Validation against six literature datasets (CFRP and aramid laminates; <i>V</i><sub><i>r</i></sub><i>–V</i><sub><i>0</i></sub> curves) shows high accuracy: median <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.93–0.96 and typical RMSE = 10–30&#xa0;m·s⁻<sup>1</sup>, with best case <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.976 and RMSE = 6.99&#xa0;m·s⁻<sup>1</sup> for thin CFRP. Ballistic-limit predictions accurately capture the nonlinear increase with thickness, with errors less than 1&#xa0;m·s⁻<sup>1</sup> in brittle CFRP and up to 10&#xa0;m·s⁻<sup>1</sup> in Kevlar laminates. A global master curve of <i>w</i><sub><i>r</i></sub> = <i>V</i><sub><i>r</i></sub><i>/V</i><sub><i>0</i></sub> versus ∥<i>Π</i>∥<sub>2</sub> collapses all data and shows a consistent trend. Energy-budget analysis quantifies the contributions of the three terms: the strength term <i>Π</i>₀ dominates in about 90% of operational points, while drag-like effects are minimal and inertial effects only appear at thick or high-velocity limits; the dominance fractions and combined contributions support these shifts. The (<i>V₀,</i> <i>h</i>) regime map, derived by setting <i>Π</i>₀ = <i>Π</i>₁ and <i>Π</i>₁ = <i>Π</i>₂, separates design-relevant domains and aligns with observed transitions in <i>V</i><sub><i>r</i></sub>–<i>V</i><sub><i>0</i></sub> modes and slopes. An independent machine-learning check using Random Forests achieves <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.992, RMSE = 17.5&#xa0;m·s⁻<sup>1</sup>, and MAE = 12.4&#xa0;m·s⁻<sup>1</sup> (fivefold cross-validation: <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.835 ± 0.145), supporting the mechanistic hierarchy through feature importance. The integrated physics-based model and machine-learning analysis provide traceable parameters (<i>α</i>, <i>β</i>, <i>γ</i>), uncertainty bounds, and practical screening maps for composite and geometric options under high-velocity impact.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Coupled Dimensional Energy Balance and Machine Learning Validation for Ballistic Response Prediction of Fiber Composites

  • Bertan Beylergil,
  • Hasan Ulus,
  • Mehmet Yildiz

摘要

In this study, we present a coupled, dimensional energy-balance model enhanced with machine-learning validation to predict residual-velocity curves and ballistic limits of fiber-reinforced composites. Projectile deceleration is described as a three-term balance involving strength-like, drag-like, and inertial effects, mapped to the nondimensional groups Π₀, Π₁, and Π₂; closed-form and RK4 solutions yield residual velocity and regime boundaries (Π₀ = Π₁, Π₁ = Π₂). Validation against six literature datasets (CFRP and aramid laminates; Vr–V0 curves) shows high accuracy: median R2 = 0.93–0.96 and typical RMSE = 10–30 m·s⁻1, with best case R2 = 0.976 and RMSE = 6.99 m·s⁻1 for thin CFRP. Ballistic-limit predictions accurately capture the nonlinear increase with thickness, with errors less than 1 m·s⁻1 in brittle CFRP and up to 10 m·s⁻1 in Kevlar laminates. A global master curve of wr = Vr/V0 versus ∥Π2 collapses all data and shows a consistent trend. Energy-budget analysis quantifies the contributions of the three terms: the strength term Π₀ dominates in about 90% of operational points, while drag-like effects are minimal and inertial effects only appear at thick or high-velocity limits; the dominance fractions and combined contributions support these shifts. The (V₀, h) regime map, derived by setting Π₀ = Π₁ and Π₁ = Π₂, separates design-relevant domains and aligns with observed transitions in VrV0 modes and slopes. An independent machine-learning check using Random Forests achieves R2 = 0.992, RMSE = 17.5 m·s⁻1, and MAE = 12.4 m·s⁻1 (fivefold cross-validation: R2 = 0.835 ± 0.145), supporting the mechanistic hierarchy through feature importance. The integrated physics-based model and machine-learning analysis provide traceable parameters (α, β, γ), uncertainty bounds, and practical screening maps for composite and geometric options under high-velocity impact.