<p>In this paper, we consider Wang’s <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(CD_p(m,{\mathcal {K}})\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>C</mi> <msub> <mi>D</mi> <mi>p</mi> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>m</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi mathvariant="script">K</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> condition on graphs, which depends on the <i>p</i>-Laplacian <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Delta _p\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mi> <mi>p</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> for <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(p&gt;1\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>p</mi> <mo>&gt;</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and is an extension of the classical Bakry-Émery <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(CD(m,{\mathcal {K}})\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>C</mi> <mi>D</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>m</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi mathvariant="script">K</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> curvature dimension condition. We calculate several examples including paths, cycles and star graphs, and we show that the <i>p</i>-curvature is non-negative at some vertices in the case <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(p\ge 2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>p</mi> <mo>≥</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, while it approaches to <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(-\infty \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo>-</mo> <mi>∞</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> in the case of <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(1&lt;p&lt;2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> <mo>&lt;</mo> <mi>p</mi> <mo>&lt;</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. In addition, we observe that a crucial property of <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Gamma _2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> on Cartesian products does no longer hold for <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Gamma _2^p\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msubsup> <mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mi> <mn>2</mn> <mi>p</mi> </msubsup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> in the case of <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(p &gt; 2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>p</mi> <mo>&gt;</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. As a consequence, an analogous proof that non-negative curvature is preserved under taking Cartesian products is not possible for <InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(p &gt; 2.\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>p</mi> <mo>&gt;</mo> <mn>2</mn> <mo>.</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation></p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

A brief note about p-curvature on graphs

  • Chunyang Hu

摘要

In this paper, we consider Wang’s \(CD_p(m,{\mathcal {K}})\) C D p ( m , K ) condition on graphs, which depends on the p-Laplacian \(\Delta _p\) Δ p for \(p>1\) p > 1 and is an extension of the classical Bakry-Émery \(CD(m,{\mathcal {K}})\) C D ( m , K ) curvature dimension condition. We calculate several examples including paths, cycles and star graphs, and we show that the p-curvature is non-negative at some vertices in the case \(p\ge 2\) p 2 , while it approaches to \(-\infty \) - in the case of \(1<p<2\) 1 < p < 2 . In addition, we observe that a crucial property of \(\Gamma _2\) Γ 2 on Cartesian products does no longer hold for \(\Gamma _2^p\) Γ 2 p in the case of \(p > 2\) p > 2 . As a consequence, an analogous proof that non-negative curvature is preserved under taking Cartesian products is not possible for \(p > 2.\) p > 2 .