Scholarlink

Purpose of review <p>To provide a comprehensive overview of the indications for lateral extra-articular tenodesis in addition to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), followed by a discussion on the existing techniques with their perceived advantages and disadvantages.</p> Recent findings <p>Recent evidence has shifted lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) from a routine “add-on” to a selective adjunct for patients at higher risk of residual rotatory instability and ACL graft failure after isolated ACLR. Level I clinical evidence suggests that adding an iliotibial (ITB) – based LET can meaningfully reduce graft rupture rates while improving control of pivot shift – type instability. The 2025 International Consensus on lateral extra-articular procedures (LEAPs) supports LET/anterolateral augmentation particularly for revision ACLR, high-grade pivot shift, generalized laxity or hyperextension/recurvatum, and young athletes returning to pivoting/contact sports. The consensus also mentions that modern LEAPs have low complication rates, do not typically require altered rehabilitation, and have not shown a consistent signal for increased lateral compartment osteoarthritis when contemporary technique principles are followed. Finally, despite the variety of described constructs (modified Lemaire variants, other ITB-based tenodeses, and anatomic ALL reconstruction), current literature does not demonstrate a single universally superior technique. Instead, success appears to be linked to correct patient selection, adherence to key technical principles (appropriate graft routing &amp; low-tension fixation), and age or skeletal – maturity – appropriate modifications.</p> Summary <p>When applied selectively in high-risk patients, adding a lateral extra-articular tenodesis to ACL reconstruction can improve rotational control and reduce re-injury, but current evidence does not support a single universally superior LET construct. Optimal results depend on appropriate indications, careful technique, and tailoring the approach to patient factors such as age, sport demands, laxity profile, and skeletal maturity.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Extra-articular Tenodesis for ACL Reconstruction: Who Needs it and is there a Superior Technique?

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年4月2日

查看全文
  • Enejd Veizi,
  • Lucy Oliver-Welsh,
  • Christos Koutserimpas,
  • Emrah Imat,
  • Alan Getgood

摘要

Purpose of review

To provide a comprehensive overview of the indications for lateral extra-articular tenodesis in addition to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), followed by a discussion on the existing techniques with their perceived advantages and disadvantages.

Recent findings

Recent evidence has shifted lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) from a routine “add-on” to a selective adjunct for patients at higher risk of residual rotatory instability and ACL graft failure after isolated ACLR. Level I clinical evidence suggests that adding an iliotibial (ITB) – based LET can meaningfully reduce graft rupture rates while improving control of pivot shift – type instability. The 2025 International Consensus on lateral extra-articular procedures (LEAPs) supports LET/anterolateral augmentation particularly for revision ACLR, high-grade pivot shift, generalized laxity or hyperextension/recurvatum, and young athletes returning to pivoting/contact sports. The consensus also mentions that modern LEAPs have low complication rates, do not typically require altered rehabilitation, and have not shown a consistent signal for increased lateral compartment osteoarthritis when contemporary technique principles are followed. Finally, despite the variety of described constructs (modified Lemaire variants, other ITB-based tenodeses, and anatomic ALL reconstruction), current literature does not demonstrate a single universally superior technique. Instead, success appears to be linked to correct patient selection, adherence to key technical principles (appropriate graft routing & low-tension fixation), and age or skeletal – maturity – appropriate modifications.

Summary

When applied selectively in high-risk patients, adding a lateral extra-articular tenodesis to ACL reconstruction can improve rotational control and reduce re-injury, but current evidence does not support a single universally superior LET construct. Optimal results depend on appropriate indications, careful technique, and tailoring the approach to patient factors such as age, sport demands, laxity profile, and skeletal maturity.