<p>Foodborne pathogens remain a major public health concern, necessitating reliable and rapid detection methods suitable for diverse food matrices. This study evaluated culture-based ISO methods, a molecular LAMP-based system (3&#xa0;M™ Molecular Detection System, 3&#xa0;M MDS), and an immunoassay-based platform (VIDAS® ELFA) for the detection of <i>Salmonella</i> spp., <i>Listeria monocytogenes</i> (alone and in the presence of <i>Listeria innocua</i>), <i>Escherichia coli</i> O157:H7, and <i>Campylobacter</i> spp. in a controlled UHT milk matrix. Samples were artificially contaminated under low-level (10<sup>1</sup>–10<sup>2</sup>&#xa0;CFU/mL), high-level (10<sup>4</sup>–10<sup>5</sup>&#xa0;CFU/mL), and heat-inactivated conditions. At high contamination levels, all methods consistently detected most target pathogens. Under low-level contamination, method-dependent variability was observed, particularly for <i>E. coli</i> O157:H7 and mixed <i>Listeria</i> populations. Variable molecular detection of <i>E. coli</i> O157:H7 may be associated with instability of <i>stx</i> genes, whereas the chromosomally encoded <i>eae</i> gene remained consistently detectable. In samples containing both <i>L. monocytogenes</i> and <i>L. innocua</i>, recovery of <i>L. monocytogenes</i> was inconsistent across methods, indicating competitive effects during enrichment. In heat-inactivated samples, direct plating confirmed loss of culturability following thermal treatment; however, positive results were occasionally detected, possibly due to residual DNA or antigenic components. This study provides a harmonized comparison of ISO, 3&#xa0;M MDS, and VIDAS across multiple foodborne pathogens under both viable and heat-inactivated conditions, addressing less explored aspects. Overall, the findings provide biological context for method-dependent detection outcomes and highlight the complementary roles of culture-based and rapid detection approaches, emphasizing context-aware interpretation in routine testing.</p> Graphical Abstract <p></p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Analytical Detection Behavior of ISO, 3M MDS and VIDAS in Artificially Contaminated UHT Milk Under Viable and Heat-Inactivated Conditions

  • Mustafa BİLGİN,
  • Adem SOYCAN

摘要

Foodborne pathogens remain a major public health concern, necessitating reliable and rapid detection methods suitable for diverse food matrices. This study evaluated culture-based ISO methods, a molecular LAMP-based system (3 M™ Molecular Detection System, 3 M MDS), and an immunoassay-based platform (VIDAS® ELFA) for the detection of Salmonella spp., Listeria monocytogenes (alone and in the presence of Listeria innocua), Escherichia coli O157:H7, and Campylobacter spp. in a controlled UHT milk matrix. Samples were artificially contaminated under low-level (101–102 CFU/mL), high-level (104–105 CFU/mL), and heat-inactivated conditions. At high contamination levels, all methods consistently detected most target pathogens. Under low-level contamination, method-dependent variability was observed, particularly for E. coli O157:H7 and mixed Listeria populations. Variable molecular detection of E. coli O157:H7 may be associated with instability of stx genes, whereas the chromosomally encoded eae gene remained consistently detectable. In samples containing both L. monocytogenes and L. innocua, recovery of L. monocytogenes was inconsistent across methods, indicating competitive effects during enrichment. In heat-inactivated samples, direct plating confirmed loss of culturability following thermal treatment; however, positive results were occasionally detected, possibly due to residual DNA or antigenic components. This study provides a harmonized comparison of ISO, 3 M MDS, and VIDAS across multiple foodborne pathogens under both viable and heat-inactivated conditions, addressing less explored aspects. Overall, the findings provide biological context for method-dependent detection outcomes and highlight the complementary roles of culture-based and rapid detection approaches, emphasizing context-aware interpretation in routine testing.

Graphical Abstract