Scholarlink

<p>Using latent profile analysis, this study aimed to explore latent profiles of social and learning behavior among 4,045 students from grades 4–12 in Germany. Furthermore, the relations of these profiles with some covariates (i.e., gender, age, school type, school grades) were examined. Results supported a five-profile solution based on ten curriculum-aligned factors of social and learning behavior, i.e., six factors for social behavior (cooperation, self-perception, self-control, empathy, self-assertion, and social relationships with peers), and four factors for learning behavior (endurance, concentration, independence, and diligence in learning). These five profiles were labeled <i>Risk</i>,<i> High-Risk</i>,<i> Low Social Skills</i>,<i> Low Learning Skills</i>, and <i>Well-Adapted</i>. Girls and younger students as well as students with better school grades were more likely to be assigned to the most favorable <i>Well-Adapted</i> profile relative to the <i>High-Risk</i> profile than boys and older students or students with lower grades. In addition, elementary school students were more likely to correspond to the most unfavorable <i>Risk</i> und <i>High-Risk</i> profiles relative to the <i>Low Learning Skills</i> profile than secondary school students who were more likely to be members of the <i>Low Learning Skills</i> profile relative to the <i>Well-Adapted</i> profile. Interventions should primarily support boys and older students with lower grades in their social and learning behavior, particularly at the end of elementary school years.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Students’ profiles of social and learning behavior at school: dimensionality and determinants

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年5月21日

查看全文
  • Annette Lohbeck

摘要

Using latent profile analysis, this study aimed to explore latent profiles of social and learning behavior among 4,045 students from grades 4–12 in Germany. Furthermore, the relations of these profiles with some covariates (i.e., gender, age, school type, school grades) were examined. Results supported a five-profile solution based on ten curriculum-aligned factors of social and learning behavior, i.e., six factors for social behavior (cooperation, self-perception, self-control, empathy, self-assertion, and social relationships with peers), and four factors for learning behavior (endurance, concentration, independence, and diligence in learning). These five profiles were labeled Risk, High-Risk, Low Social Skills, Low Learning Skills, and Well-Adapted. Girls and younger students as well as students with better school grades were more likely to be assigned to the most favorable Well-Adapted profile relative to the High-Risk profile than boys and older students or students with lower grades. In addition, elementary school students were more likely to correspond to the most unfavorable Risk und High-Risk profiles relative to the Low Learning Skills profile than secondary school students who were more likely to be members of the Low Learning Skills profile relative to the Well-Adapted profile. Interventions should primarily support boys and older students with lower grades in their social and learning behavior, particularly at the end of elementary school years.