<p>Return migration, where individuals return to their place of origin after a period of migration, remains an underexplored yet increasingly important phenomenon, particularly in the context of internal migration in developing countries like India. This study examines the occupational choices of return migrants in rural Jharkhand, drawing on primary data from 383 households, selected through a multi-stage stratified random sampling. To address potential selection bias, a two-stage residual inclusion estimation method is employed. First, a multinomial logit model evaluates the occupational choices of returnees compared to non-migrants. Second, a probit model assesses the impact of migration experiences, such as accumulated savings and skill acquisition at the destination, on these choices. The findings of the study are as follows: (i) return migrants are more likely to engage in self-employed non-farm activities than non-migrants, and (ii) accumulated savings and skill acquisitions increase the likelihood of engaging in such activities. These findings highlight important policy implications, including the need for investments in rural infrastructure to expand non-farm sectors, the promotion of agricultural initiatives recognizing the interdependence of farm and non-farm sectors, and the prioritization of education focusing on practical skills and entrepreneurship. These strategies can empower the younger generation and foster resilience by leveraging return migrants’ contributions to diversified rural economies.&#xa0;</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Does Return Migration Impact Occupational Choice? An Empirical Evidence from Rural Jharkhand, India

  • Suchi Smita Swain,
  • Gurudas Das,
  • Ujjwal Kanti Paul

摘要

Return migration, where individuals return to their place of origin after a period of migration, remains an underexplored yet increasingly important phenomenon, particularly in the context of internal migration in developing countries like India. This study examines the occupational choices of return migrants in rural Jharkhand, drawing on primary data from 383 households, selected through a multi-stage stratified random sampling. To address potential selection bias, a two-stage residual inclusion estimation method is employed. First, a multinomial logit model evaluates the occupational choices of returnees compared to non-migrants. Second, a probit model assesses the impact of migration experiences, such as accumulated savings and skill acquisition at the destination, on these choices. The findings of the study are as follows: (i) return migrants are more likely to engage in self-employed non-farm activities than non-migrants, and (ii) accumulated savings and skill acquisitions increase the likelihood of engaging in such activities. These findings highlight important policy implications, including the need for investments in rural infrastructure to expand non-farm sectors, the promotion of agricultural initiatives recognizing the interdependence of farm and non-farm sectors, and the prioritization of education focusing on practical skills and entrepreneurship. These strategies can empower the younger generation and foster resilience by leveraging return migrants’ contributions to diversified rural economies.