Scholarlink

<p>This study translated, adapted, and validated the LGBTQ-phobic Behaviors Scale for use in Brazil, examining its convergent validity with the Attitudes Toward LGBTQ+ Media Scale. LGBTQ-phobia—expressed through discriminatory attitudes and behaviors—represents a serious societal problem in Brazil, where violence against LGBTQ+ individuals remains alarmingly prevalent. The study involved 300 participants who completed both scales. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported a two-factor structure for the scale, comprising Support (7 items) and Contact (3 items) subscales. The model demonstrated excellent fit indices (RMSEA = 0.040; CFI = 0.997; TLI = 0.995) and high internal consistency (α &gt; 0.80). Spearman correlation analyses revealed significant negative associations between attitudes toward LGBTQ+ media representation and LGBTQ-phobic behaviors (Support: ρ = − 0.53; Contact: ρ = − 0.43; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01), indicating that more negative media attitudes correlate with higher levels of LGBTQ-phobia. Limitations include the use of a non-representative sample and the absence of items assessing explicit discriminatory acts. Future research should expand sampling, incorporate measures of overt discriminatory behaviors, and examine potential moderators such as gender and sexual orientation. In conclusion, the LGBTQ-phobic Behaviors Scale demonstrates strong psychometric properties, providing researchers and practitioners with a valid, reliable tool for assessing and combating anti-LGBTQ+ prejudice in Brazil.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Translation, Adaptation, Validity Evidence, and Correlates for the Measure of LGBTQ-Phobic Behaviors

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年12月22日

查看全文
  • Ericarla Verônica Almeida Dias,
  • Carlos Eduardo Pimentel

摘要

This study translated, adapted, and validated the LGBTQ-phobic Behaviors Scale for use in Brazil, examining its convergent validity with the Attitudes Toward LGBTQ+ Media Scale. LGBTQ-phobia—expressed through discriminatory attitudes and behaviors—represents a serious societal problem in Brazil, where violence against LGBTQ+ individuals remains alarmingly prevalent. The study involved 300 participants who completed both scales. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported a two-factor structure for the scale, comprising Support (7 items) and Contact (3 items) subscales. The model demonstrated excellent fit indices (RMSEA = 0.040; CFI = 0.997; TLI = 0.995) and high internal consistency (α > 0.80). Spearman correlation analyses revealed significant negative associations between attitudes toward LGBTQ+ media representation and LGBTQ-phobic behaviors (Support: ρ = − 0.53; Contact: ρ = − 0.43; p < 0.01), indicating that more negative media attitudes correlate with higher levels of LGBTQ-phobia. Limitations include the use of a non-representative sample and the absence of items assessing explicit discriminatory acts. Future research should expand sampling, incorporate measures of overt discriminatory behaviors, and examine potential moderators such as gender and sexual orientation. In conclusion, the LGBTQ-phobic Behaviors Scale demonstrates strong psychometric properties, providing researchers and practitioners with a valid, reliable tool for assessing and combating anti-LGBTQ+ prejudice in Brazil.