Objectives <p>To test the impacts of watching an interview of an incarcerated person serving a life without parole sentence on participants’ views of crime attribution.</p> Methods <p>Survey participants answered questions related to several topics, including crime attribution, before and after watching a randomly-assigned video of an incarcerated person discussing their personal narrative. Videos varied according to the race of the incarcerated person and their self-described personal circumstances before arrest.</p> Results <p>Videos where difficult circumstances were presented or where the subject was Black elicited more situational views of crime. Political Independents also held more situational views post-intervention. Before any intervention, men, Republicans, older people, and wealthier people held more dispositional views of crime, whereas Atheists held much more situational views.</p> Conclusions <p>Videos depicting the lived experiences of incarcerated people can change public attribution style, but only when the video depicts a person whose criminality can be linked to their personal circumstances.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

The Power of Story: Assessing Crime Attribution before and After Watching Videos of Incarcerated People Serving Life Without Parole Sentences

  • Daniel Sailofsky,
  • Miltonette Craig,
  • Paul Bleakley

摘要

Objectives

To test the impacts of watching an interview of an incarcerated person serving a life without parole sentence on participants’ views of crime attribution.

Methods

Survey participants answered questions related to several topics, including crime attribution, before and after watching a randomly-assigned video of an incarcerated person discussing their personal narrative. Videos varied according to the race of the incarcerated person and their self-described personal circumstances before arrest.

Results

Videos where difficult circumstances were presented or where the subject was Black elicited more situational views of crime. Political Independents also held more situational views post-intervention. Before any intervention, men, Republicans, older people, and wealthier people held more dispositional views of crime, whereas Atheists held much more situational views.

Conclusions

Videos depicting the lived experiences of incarcerated people can change public attribution style, but only when the video depicts a person whose criminality can be linked to their personal circumstances.