Objective <p>Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) are at high risk of developing postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). This study aimed to develop and validate a clinical prediction model for these complications after CABG.</p> Methods <p>In total, 849 patients were randomly divided into training (<i>n</i>=594) and validation (<i>n</i>=255) sets in a 7:3 ratio. We used least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression to identify predictive variables, incorporated them into a multivariable logistic regression model, and developed a nomogram. Model performance was assessed through discrimination (receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, area under the curve (AUC)), calibration (calibration curves, maximum calibration error (Emax), average calibration error (Eavg)), and clinical utility assessment (decision curve analysis).</p> Results <p>Five predictive indicators were selected: age, smoking history, diabetes mellitus, emergent surgery, and anesthesia duration. The model demonstrated excellent predictive performance, with an AUC of 0.902 (0.859–0.945) for the training set and 0.864 (0.811–0.917) for the validation set. Calibration curve results showed non-significant <i>P</i>-values from the unreliability test (<i>P</i> = 0.861 for training set, <i>P</i> = 0.741 for validation set), indicating excellent calibration. Emax and Eavg values were 0.042 and 0.013 for the training set, and 0.046 and 0.009 for the validation set, respectively, showing a strong agreement between the predicted values and actual observations.</p> Conclusion <p>An original nomogram accurately predicted PPCs after CABG with CPB, which enables clinicians to rapidly assess PPC risk for individual patients without complex calculations, providing objective, quantitative evidence for preoperative risk evaluation, informed consent discussions, and perioperative management.</p> Graphical Abstract <p></p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Development and validation of a nomogram-based model for predicting postoperative pulmonary complications after coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass

  • Ying Ji,
  • Jingjing Liu,
  • Tao Shan,
  • Ruoyu Jia,
  • Hong-guang Bao,
  • Hong-yu Wang,
  • Jing Hu,
  • Yan Shen,
  • Qian Zhao,
  • Yongjun Li

摘要

Objective

Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) are at high risk of developing postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). This study aimed to develop and validate a clinical prediction model for these complications after CABG.

Methods

In total, 849 patients were randomly divided into training (n=594) and validation (n=255) sets in a 7:3 ratio. We used least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression to identify predictive variables, incorporated them into a multivariable logistic regression model, and developed a nomogram. Model performance was assessed through discrimination (receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, area under the curve (AUC)), calibration (calibration curves, maximum calibration error (Emax), average calibration error (Eavg)), and clinical utility assessment (decision curve analysis).

Results

Five predictive indicators were selected: age, smoking history, diabetes mellitus, emergent surgery, and anesthesia duration. The model demonstrated excellent predictive performance, with an AUC of 0.902 (0.859–0.945) for the training set and 0.864 (0.811–0.917) for the validation set. Calibration curve results showed non-significant P-values from the unreliability test (P = 0.861 for training set, P = 0.741 for validation set), indicating excellent calibration. Emax and Eavg values were 0.042 and 0.013 for the training set, and 0.046 and 0.009 for the validation set, respectively, showing a strong agreement between the predicted values and actual observations.

Conclusion

An original nomogram accurately predicted PPCs after CABG with CPB, which enables clinicians to rapidly assess PPC risk for individual patients without complex calculations, providing objective, quantitative evidence for preoperative risk evaluation, informed consent discussions, and perioperative management.

Graphical Abstract