<p>Bell–Kochen–Specker theorem states that a non-contextual hidden-variable theory cannot completely reproduce the predictions of quantum mechanics. Asher Peres gave a remarkably simple proof of quantum contextuality in a four-dimensional Hilbert space of two spin-1/2 particles. Peres’ argument is enormously simpler than that of Kochen and Specker. Peres contextuality demonstrates a logical contradiction between quantum mechanics and non-contextual hidden variable models by showing an inconsistency when assigning non-contextual definite values to a certain set of quantum observables. In this work, we present a similar proof in time with a temporal version of the Peres-like argument. In analogy with the two-particle version of Peres’ argument in the context of spin measurements at two different locations, we examine here single-particle spin measurements at two different times <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="12043_2025_2986_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="42" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(t=t_1\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <msub> <mi>t</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="12043_2025_2986_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="42" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(t=t_2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <msub> <mi>t</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. We adopt three classical assumptions for time-separated measurements, which are demonstrated to conflict with quantum mechanical predictions. Consequently, we provide a non-probabilistic proof of certified quantumness in time, without relying on inequalities, demonstrating that our approach can certify the quantumness of a device through single-shot, time-separated measurements. Our results can be experimentally verified with the present quantum technology.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Certified quantumness via single-shot temporal measurements

  • Md Manirul Ali,
  • Sovik Roy

摘要

Bell–Kochen–Specker theorem states that a non-contextual hidden-variable theory cannot completely reproduce the predictions of quantum mechanics. Asher Peres gave a remarkably simple proof of quantum contextuality in a four-dimensional Hilbert space of two spin-1/2 particles. Peres’ argument is enormously simpler than that of Kochen and Specker. Peres contextuality demonstrates a logical contradiction between quantum mechanics and non-contextual hidden variable models by showing an inconsistency when assigning non-contextual definite values to a certain set of quantum observables. In this work, we present a similar proof in time with a temporal version of the Peres-like argument. In analogy with the two-particle version of Peres’ argument in the context of spin measurements at two different locations, we examine here single-particle spin measurements at two different times \(t=t_1\) t = t 1 and \(t=t_2\) t = t 2 . We adopt three classical assumptions for time-separated measurements, which are demonstrated to conflict with quantum mechanical predictions. Consequently, we provide a non-probabilistic proof of certified quantumness in time, without relying on inequalities, demonstrating that our approach can certify the quantumness of a device through single-shot, time-separated measurements. Our results can be experimentally verified with the present quantum technology.