Scholarlink

Introduction <p>There has been a surge in attention to ethical controversies associated with organ donation in the USA. The Neurocritical Care Society (NCS) Ethics Committee sought to understand member experiences and attitudes related to organ donation in the USA.</p> Methods <p>We designed a survey of members who practice in the USA and have interacted with an organ procurement organization (OPO)/potential donor. The survey was disseminated by NCS from 1 June 2025 to 1 September 2025. Free-text responses were reviewed to identify themes.</p> Results <p>Of 2204 NCS members in the USA, there were 71 respondents who completed the survey and 37 respondents who provided free-text comments. Experiences and attitudes varied, but 59% of respondents indicated that they generally think that communication between the OPO and patient surrogates about donation after brain death/death by neurologic criteria seems appropriate, and 34% indicated that they generally think that communication between the OPO and patient surrogates regarding donation after cardiac death/death by circulatory-respiratory criteria (DCD) seems appropriate. Themes included (1) the need to improve education for the treatment team about organ donation; (2) blurred boundaries between patient care and care directed toward organ donation; (3) misalignment between OPOs and treatment team priorities; (4) loss of trust between patient surrogates and the treatment team based on interactions with OPOs; (5) suboptimal timing of communication between OPOs and patient surrogates; (6) concerns regarding a potential lack of transparency, empathy, and cultural sensitivity in communication between OPOs and patient surrogates; (7) opportunities for improvement in preoperative care before donation and palliation after extubation for DCD; and (8) changes in willingness to donate organs based on interactions with OPOs.</p> Conclusions <p>Although the results from this survey reflect the experience and attitudes of a small percentage of NCS members in the USA, they indicate that there are opportunities for improvement in organ donation processes. Survey results will guide the NCS Ethics Committee in supporting members navigating ethical controversies related to organ donation.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Neurocritical Care Experience and Attitudes Related to Organ Donation in the USA

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年2月3日

查看全文
  • Ariane Lewis,
  • Mitch Hargis,
  • Julia Durrant,
  • Stefanie Cappucci,
  • Richard Choi,
  • Chad Condie,
  • Richard Gandee,
  • Krista Lim-Hing,
  • Daryl McHugh,
  • Vishal Patel,
  • Alexandra Reynolds,
  • Allison Tompeck,
  • Matthew N. Jaffa

摘要

Introduction

There has been a surge in attention to ethical controversies associated with organ donation in the USA. The Neurocritical Care Society (NCS) Ethics Committee sought to understand member experiences and attitudes related to organ donation in the USA.

Methods

We designed a survey of members who practice in the USA and have interacted with an organ procurement organization (OPO)/potential donor. The survey was disseminated by NCS from 1 June 2025 to 1 September 2025. Free-text responses were reviewed to identify themes.

Results

Of 2204 NCS members in the USA, there were 71 respondents who completed the survey and 37 respondents who provided free-text comments. Experiences and attitudes varied, but 59% of respondents indicated that they generally think that communication between the OPO and patient surrogates about donation after brain death/death by neurologic criteria seems appropriate, and 34% indicated that they generally think that communication between the OPO and patient surrogates regarding donation after cardiac death/death by circulatory-respiratory criteria (DCD) seems appropriate. Themes included (1) the need to improve education for the treatment team about organ donation; (2) blurred boundaries between patient care and care directed toward organ donation; (3) misalignment between OPOs and treatment team priorities; (4) loss of trust between patient surrogates and the treatment team based on interactions with OPOs; (5) suboptimal timing of communication between OPOs and patient surrogates; (6) concerns regarding a potential lack of transparency, empathy, and cultural sensitivity in communication between OPOs and patient surrogates; (7) opportunities for improvement in preoperative care before donation and palliation after extubation for DCD; and (8) changes in willingness to donate organs based on interactions with OPOs.

Conclusions

Although the results from this survey reflect the experience and attitudes of a small percentage of NCS members in the USA, they indicate that there are opportunities for improvement in organ donation processes. Survey results will guide the NCS Ethics Committee in supporting members navigating ethical controversies related to organ donation.