Scholarlink

Purpose <p>Unannounced meals pose a major challenge to type 1 diabetes patients. This study compared the performance of two automated insulin delivery (AID) algorithms, the Medtronic MiniMed 780G’s proportional-integral-derivative (PID) and the Tandem t: slim X2’s model predictive control (MPC), following unannounced breakfasts (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT07455643, retrospectively registered the 3rd of February 2026).</p> Methods <p>In a randomized crossover study, we enrolled 20 children between 11 and 18 years using the MiniMed 780G or the Tandem t: slim X2 AID system. Endpoints included 2-hour and 4-hour blood glucose difference (ΔBG), glucose peak, time to peak, and time spent above (TAR), below (TBS), in range (TIR), and in tight range (TITR). Two meals were tested: a carbohydrate (CHO) meal and a mixed one, both containing 30&#xa0;g of carbohydrates, and additional 15&#xa0;g proteins for the mixed meal. Announced (AM) and unannounced (UM) meals were analyzed.</p> Results <p>AM, compared to UM, showed significant higher 2-hourΔBG; conversely 4-hourΔBG did not differ significantly. In CHO AM, algorithms were comparable. In mixed AM, PID gained lower peaks and TAR, with higher TIR and TITR. In UM, PID obtained lower 2-hourΔBG than MPC, with reduced peak, TAR, and improved TIR and TITR. Differences in 4-hourΔBG and time-at-peak were not significant.</p> Conclusion <p>Both AID algorithms mitigated postprandial glycemia and returned glucose to baseline levels within 4&#xa0;h without safety concerns. The PID demonstrated higher reactivity to unannounced meals, while performances were comparable when meal boluses were properly announced.</p> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier <p>NCT07455643.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

The CRUMB study: closed-loop response to unannounced mixed and carbohydrates-rich breakfasts. A randomized controlled crossover pilot-study in a cohort of adolescents with type 1 diabetes

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年7月10日

查看全文
  • Donatella Lo Presti,
  • Salvatore Scirè Calabrisotto,
  • Letizia Grazia Tomaselli,
  • Giulia Pezzino,
  • Francesco Frasca,
  • Roberto Baratta,
  • Laura Sciacca,
  • Concetta Latina,
  • Nadia La Spina,
  • Francesco Galeano,
  • Vittorio Oteri,
  • Andrea Tumminia

摘要

Purpose

Unannounced meals pose a major challenge to type 1 diabetes patients. This study compared the performance of two automated insulin delivery (AID) algorithms, the Medtronic MiniMed 780G’s proportional-integral-derivative (PID) and the Tandem t: slim X2’s model predictive control (MPC), following unannounced breakfasts (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT07455643, retrospectively registered the 3rd of February 2026).

Methods

In a randomized crossover study, we enrolled 20 children between 11 and 18 years using the MiniMed 780G or the Tandem t: slim X2 AID system. Endpoints included 2-hour and 4-hour blood glucose difference (ΔBG), glucose peak, time to peak, and time spent above (TAR), below (TBS), in range (TIR), and in tight range (TITR). Two meals were tested: a carbohydrate (CHO) meal and a mixed one, both containing 30 g of carbohydrates, and additional 15 g proteins for the mixed meal. Announced (AM) and unannounced (UM) meals were analyzed.

Results

AM, compared to UM, showed significant higher 2-hourΔBG; conversely 4-hourΔBG did not differ significantly. In CHO AM, algorithms were comparable. In mixed AM, PID gained lower peaks and TAR, with higher TIR and TITR. In UM, PID obtained lower 2-hourΔBG than MPC, with reduced peak, TAR, and improved TIR and TITR. Differences in 4-hourΔBG and time-at-peak were not significant.

Conclusion

Both AID algorithms mitigated postprandial glycemia and returned glucose to baseline levels within 4 h without safety concerns. The PID demonstrated higher reactivity to unannounced meals, while performances were comparable when meal boluses were properly announced.

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier

NCT07455643.